|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
Doomsday Has Been Postponed We're still not approaching "peak oil": A landmark study of more than 800 oilfields by Cambridge Energy Research Associates (Cera) has concluded that rates of decline are only 4.5 per cent a year, almost half the rate previously believed, leading the consultancy to conclude that oil output will continue to rise over the next decade. That would imply falling prices, to me. I stand by my prediction that oil will never be sustained for long at its current price levels (adjusting for inflation and exchange rates). Posted by Rand Simberg at January 18, 2008 08:42 AMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/8889 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
I stand by my prediction that oil will never be sustained for long at its current price levels In that case, Nostradamus, you can put your money where your mouth is, by selling short the oil future for December 2015. It is currently trading at over $86. Although it is true that exchange rates have taken a toll. The dollar has lost a third of its value against the Euro since 1999. Careful Rand, I think Nostradumbass is trying to make yet another point about the rotten economy, high oil prices and GWB's overall involvement. I could be wrong though, most of my oil investing is done at the price per tank full level. Usually in $40 to $50 increments. Oil futures at my house are based solely on how much I drive. Posted by Steve at January 18, 2008 09:22 AMDidn't OPEC say that they couldn't increase production of oil because there was not enough refinery infrastructure to catch any new supply? And why is that? If gas demand is going through the roof, why aren't there new refineries to supply it? When the market isn't appearing to work - look for government meddling. Posted by Donut at January 18, 2008 09:34 AMIn currencies other than the dollar oil prices are not climbing as much. A lot of this is the fall of the dollar. We, America, have been spending on our National Credit Card. This is coming home to roost, we can't afford things like the wars in Iraq etc.... So we now have a potential recession so what do the dim bulbs in Washington do? They spend even more money on a stimulus package ! ARGHHHHHHHH. Didn't OPEC say that they couldn't increase production of oil because there was not enough refinery infrastructure to catch any new supply? Is it in their interest to maximize production? When demand rises faster than supply, which this year it certainly did, they profit by saving most of their oil for the future. Might you define long? Posted by CJ at January 18, 2008 09:49 AMDonut: The refinery crunch is a different problem. Refiners can't get permission to build new refineries, and are having a heck of a time just getting permission to expand their current throughput. It's not a market problem, it's a government/NIMBY problem, and together with issues like the boutique blends, leads to higher gas prices somewhat independent of the price of oil. Posted by Big D at January 18, 2008 10:28 AMOPEC profits best by not losing market share to non-OPEC sources. If they deliberately drive up the price of their oil, they encourage non-OPEC producers -- such as those in the United States -- to invest in exploiting reserves that would, in a normal oil market, be too expensive to extract. There's an oil boom going on in many parts of the U.S. these days, with resources being developed that had been lying fallow because there just wasn't enough money in it. I'm not sure how OPEC benefits by inviting more competitors into the market. Either they're undercutting their own market power on purpose for some reason, or they're doing so unintentionally, perhaps out of stupidity. Posted by McGehee at January 18, 2008 12:25 PMThere will be a peak oil production year, just as there was a peak foaling year for horses, and for the same reason. Anybody who worries about it is, with all due respect, a moron. Posted by Jay Manifold at January 18, 2008 12:33 PMBack during the stone age there were wild predictions about the arrival of "peak stone". Was the era of stone over? What would happen to civilization when all the stones were used up? Policymakers came up with plans to tax stone to decrease its use. Others favored mandates for smaller stone tools and stone structures. Still others pestered for government incentives to create viable alternatives to stone. Regrettably, nobody acted on these sound plans and the stone age did end. The price of stone got just too damn high for anyone to want or need stone anymore. Posted by Jardinero1 at January 18, 2008 02:32 PMOpec (the Saudi's) have kept oil flowing normally because if prices rose to high people would look around for other options. In the 80s it was smaller cars and ethanal pork. During the 90s oil flowed, Suvs started showing up, and alternate fuel bets were put on Hydrogen which is always 20 years out. I believe the tech is finally there with flex-fuel (Zubrin's interview with Instapundit sold me) and combined with the current high oil prices and a Presidential contest... Well I think that Opec may have screwed up at the worst time by not doing everything possible to get the prices down before now. Posted by rjschwarz at January 18, 2008 03:28 PMWhile the Stone Age was not believed to have ended on account of Peak Stone, or perhaps Peak Flint or other prime grades of stone, there is some speculation that the Dark Ages that came at the end of the Bronze Age had to do with Peak Tin. Posted by Paul Milenkovic at January 18, 2008 06:04 PMPaul, Paul, What about them impending peak German Shepard AKA Peak Rin Tin-Tin? Posted by Mike Puckett at January 19, 2008 04:01 PMJim, in the link above, you can see that the market thinks oil will drop for the next five years. In that case, it's in SA's interest to pump as much as possible (without causing the rest of OPEC to detect cheating). And for the subsequent 5 years, oil is expected to be rising at less than the expected level of inflation. Again, dominant strategy is to pump all you can if you're Saudi Arabia. This is consistent with Wind, Nuclear, and Solar electric cars, Biofuels, better extraction technologies and hybrid transport technologies cut the demand for oil relative to its supply. If you think it will rise, buy the 2015 future or oil company stock. Recall also that in 7 years, incomes around the world including in the states will be up by about 20%. Thus if inflation is about 3%, we can expect oil to be 40% cheaper in terms of hours worked. And if one drives a hybrid car, a mile will cost 70% cheaper in 2015 than today. Throw in $2500 cars from India and driving will get really cheap. Nice crisis. Let's have more of them. This is your cue to stop complaining about peak oil and shift to complaining about global warming. Posted by Sam Dinkin at January 19, 2008 04:33 PMPost a comment |