|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
Good Lord What kind of nancy boys does Brooks Brothers think we are? Looks like just the thing for that all-male boarding school, complete with spankings. Is that price the amount that they'd pay us to wear these abominations? If so, it's nowhere near enough. [Afternoon update] And check out this cashmere down vest with the short pants. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. In what kind of weather would one wear that ensemble? You know, the Brits have a word for people who would wear this stuff. Though I guess we had one of our own, back in the day, the most prominent of whom was called Yankee Doodle. Posted by Rand Simberg at January 12, 2008 05:24 AMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/8853 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
What gets me is the knee breeches. That really should be accesorized with a powdered wig and silver-buckled shoes. Also, is it me, or is that jacket about a size too small for the guy wearing it? Posted by Joseph T Major at January 12, 2008 05:46 AMIt looks like their Mothers are still dressing them. This culture is working overtime trying to emasculate males. Posted by CoInkyDink at January 12, 2008 06:59 AMThese costumes do look silly in our culture. I don't know who Brooks thinks it is targeting (other than a small segment of the gay male population). But if there is a mainstream market for this type of garb I would not worry unless masculinity hinges upon whether pants are cut at the knee vs. the ankle. Which I am sure it does not. When we start seeing soft pink frilly jackets and slacks for men I would still not worry. Manliness comes from within, and speaking for women, we care mostly about what is IN your pants. Wrong, wrong, wrong...wrong, wrong...wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong... I'm not sure even the gay guys would wear that. Except as a costume for attending an AC/DC concert, where they would undoubtedly get a severe drubbing. Posted by Steve at January 12, 2008 08:18 AMAnd check out the high water pants with the 5" cuffs. The jacket sleeves look a little short as well. Even if I were filthy rich I wouldn't pay $2000 for a suit no matter how good it looked. Apart from the knickers I think this is more an early 20th century British retro look. Did you see that cape? All that was missing was the cap and meersham pipe. Posted by Orville at January 12, 2008 08:24 AMWhat the fashionable time traveler is -- er, was -- wearing. Posted by McGehee at January 12, 2008 09:41 AMJust wait until as much unflattering and absurdly expensive clothing is targeted at you men as we have aimed at us, guys. There's a whole industry designed to convince me that I need to have $2,000 shoes with four inch heels. Posted by Jane Bernstein at January 12, 2008 10:35 AMThere's a whole industry designed to convince me that I need to have $2,000 shoes with four inch heels. Well, they don't hold a gun to your head. As long as women put up with this stuff, they'll continue to do it. Of course, I have a long-standing theory that the fashion industry is warfare against women by gay men, particularly the boyish figures of the models. And what's worse, the women finance the war. Anyway, it's a pretty sad day when (so-called) men start to buy into it. Posted by Rand Simberg at January 12, 2008 11:19 AMRand, if you look carefully, you will see this is a high fashion "runway" collection. If you ever watch a fashion show, you will see very few pieces that most people would actually wear. These are the clothing industry's equivalent of "concept cars." Posted by Edward Wright at January 12, 2008 12:16 PM"There's a whole industry designed to convince me that I need to have $2,000 shoes with four inch heels." That's because the industry knows how much you love shoes, Jane. The Devil may wear Prada, but it's never complete without four inch heels. Posted by Roger Kosavin at January 12, 2008 12:23 PMThere may be another explanation for those "boyish" models. Any teenage to 20-something girl would immediately point out how much they look like Leonardo DiCaprio. The idea is probably to convince males in that group that they can look like Leonardo DiCaprio, if they buy Brooks Brothers clothes. Posted by Edward Wright at January 12, 2008 12:35 PMIf you ever watch a fashion show, you will see very few pieces that most people would actually wear. Let's fervently hope so. Posted by Rand Simberg at January 12, 2008 12:35 PMAny teenage to 20-something girl would immediately point out how much they look like Leonardo DiCaprio. I was referring to the boyish (sometimes almost Auschwitz-victim) figures on the female models. Posted by Rand Simberg at January 12, 2008 12:37 PMTell me about it, Roger and Rand. When I was young and foolish, I actually tried to be a model slash actress, and weighed 110 lbs. I'm 5'9", so that gives me a BMI of 16.2. I don't think I looked totally emaciated, but that's largely because my lean body mass was especially low. Now I'm much happier at 150, most of the increase having come from increased muscle mass. Four inch heels leave me at 6'1" - that's a long way up there, depending on whom you're dating. Often problematic. I agree with you guys that there's a whole industry designed around creating hideously unattractive clothing the entire purpose of which appears to be to show people that the wearer is in the very forefront of fashion. You could be charitable and describe it as provocative, wearable art, but I borrow my mother's phrase and call it the Emperor's New Couture. So today it's just jeans and a t-shirt. Like most days when I'm not at work. Posted by Jane Bernstein at January 12, 2008 12:59 PMI was referring to the boyish (sometimes almost Auschwitz-victim) figures on the female models. Oh, that one's easy. The idea is to make women feel inferior and fat (regardless of how much they actually weigh) so they'll buy the clothes to compensate.
And check out this cashmere down vest with the short pants. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. In what kind of weather would one wear that ensemble? Sense or not, you'll notice quite a few women wearing short skirts and winter coats in December. Posted by Edward Wright at January 12, 2008 02:18 PMThese are the clothing industry's equivalent of "concept cars." Except that I'd jump at the chance to drive a concept car. Preferably one with a former model slash actress in the passenger seat. ;^) Posted by Jay Manifold at January 12, 2008 05:17 PMI keep WAITING for my new car.. the deliveries are delayed over and over again. I'm getting a bit cross with Tesla motors, let me tell you. I so should have bought that Porsche. Posted by Jane Bernstein at January 12, 2008 07:37 PMI'm getting a bit cross with Tesla motors, let me tell you. Jane, maybe if you told Elon you're potentially interested in investing in SpaceX...? Posted by Rand Simberg at January 12, 2008 08:14 PMHe already has a pretty decent deposit from me, Rand. I'm not sure investing in SpaceX would move me any farther up the line. The latest problem is apparently the transmission - you wouldn't think a two speed transmission would be a problem but apparently it's a real challenge. I don't think Elon even has his car yet. Posted by Jane Bernstein at January 13, 2008 12:08 PMJust wait until as much unflattering and absurdly expensive clothing is targeted at you men as we have aimed at us, guys. There's a whole industry designed to convince me that I need to have $2,000 shoes with four inch heels. No man this side of "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" will knowingly buy uncomfortable shoes. Why women put up with that nonsense is a mystery. Fashion is for suckers. Posted by Larry J at January 14, 2008 12:14 PMPost a comment |