|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
Gotcha Cancellation Policy I recently canceled my account with Vonage and on behalf of Space Shot canceled our contract with Custom Weather upon switching to AccuWeather which is free. It took about fifteen minutes to navigate all of the extra offers that Vonage wanted to make me to try to retain me. It may be good short-term business, but I felt their hard-sell tactics alienate me. I draw the line if an organization asks me "are you sure?" after I have already said I don't want something, I complain to their customer service for being rude. They may be retaining a few extra customers, but I'll remember how long it took to cancel the service and be less likely to buy again given the "exit tax". These last few customers seem sub prime. Space Shot also canceled its contract with Custom Weather. What do you think this term in my contract with them says? ...this Agreement will continue for further successive one year periods until it is terminated by either party giving to the other not less than 90 days written notice prior to the end of the initial one year period or on any subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date... I think it means Space Shot can cancel with no notice on its second and subsequent anniversary with no notice. Space Shot also requested early termination of the current year contract which is in no way prohibited and a refund which is also consistent with policy as reported in the contract. Not acknowledged. Custom Weather CEO, Geoff Flint wrote me: I apologize if our lawyers did not make that clause clear enough since the "or" that you refer to is associated with the last verb which was "giving" in the clause "giving to the other not less than 90 days written notice." and later: Our contract was put together by a top law firm and like I said in my last email, the "or" that you referred to is always associated with the verb closest to the "or" statement and in this case, that required giving 90 days notice. But that would lead to "this Agreement will continue for further successive one year periods until it is terminated by either party giving to the other not less than 90 days written notice prior to ... on any subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date". The "on" in this read makes no sense to me. Perhaps this read: "this Agreement will continue for further successive one year periods until it is terminated by either party giving to the other not less than 90 days written notice ... on any subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date" also makes no sense. That would be 364-730 days notice which contradicts the "90 days". The only thing that makes sense to me for the second condition is "this Agreement will continue for further successive one year periods until it is terminated by either party ... on any subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date". If we agree with Geoff's read, he is committing Custom Weather to an annual negative checkoff where the negative checkoff comes ten months before the contract renewal date. His read further commits his firm to a no-refund policy. Is Vonage a case of a gotcha cancellation policy, Custom Weather, or both, or neither? Posted by Sam Dinkin at November 28, 2007 11:22 AMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/8589 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
Sorry Sam, but I read it as you are committed for a year. You can uncommit for the next year by giving 90 days notice prior to your annniversary. Regardless, I've been bitten by such scams, and now I refuse any contract that has an automatic term commitment greater than a month. As Bill C would say, "I feel your pain". Not that I need the service, but I'll stay away from Custom Weather. Also, I had the same sentiment about Vonage when I cancelled them. I wasn't using the service, so I didn't need to pay for it. Still, it wasn't as bad as when I cancelled my service with the former SBC. It took 9 months to sort that out and for them to return $150 in over collections they took and for them to remove from my credit report a collection claim of $21. Posted by Leland at November 28, 2007 11:56 AM"The only thing that makes sense to me for the second condition is "this Agreement will continue for further successive one year periods until it is terminated by either party ... on any subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date"" I agree that this is the only interpretation that makes sense, given Geoff's clarification. However, I would be concerned that Geoff didn't mean quite what he said, when he says "the "or" that you refer to is associated with the last verb which was "giving" As it stands, it sounds like either party can cancel with no notice after the first year. I don't think the 90 day period is relevant, after the first year. It sounds like you'll both be locked in for 1 year at a time. I would be surprised if that is what Geoff really wants the contract to say. Sam, please let us know how it turns out? Posted by Hillary-Supporter at November 28, 2007 12:21 PMLegal language needs to be written in computer code, with open source functions that can be tested with various inputs. Posted by at November 28, 2007 01:01 PMI agree with Leland, that I read it the way Geoff claims. I think the problem is the word "on" — remove that and Geoff's interpretation is obvious. "terminated by either party giving to the other not less than 90 days written notice prior to ((the end of the initial one year period) OR (any subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date))" But the "on" leaves a good case for Simberg's interpretation, "terminated by either party (giving to the other not less than 90 days written notice prior to the end of the initial one year period) OR (on any subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date)" However, that interpretation would tend to require notice on and only on the anniversary date. What if the company was closed? How could you terminate? They're planning to send Space Shot to collections as soon as my invoice becomes overdue. My contract doesn't indicate a due date for my fees though. Custom Weather has grown tired of answering my emails. Heather Fabela, head of sales from Custom Weather just called and told me she thought that we were "trying to weasel out of" our contract. I'd like to help Space Shot halt the agreement ASAP and think I've already done so, but reasonable people might disagree whether that's the case. Yikes! All this over a $500 contract extension. Presumably if they hold Space Shot to a standard of abiding contract terms, it would be nice if they held themselves to the same standard and go to the trouble of verifying that their billing policy is compliant with their written contract. Sorry if I'm getting your goat, Heather and Geoff. I sense a wish in their messages that their lawyers implemented their term sheet better, but they never shared that term sheet with Space Shot. Canceling a weather service seems to me like canceling a magazine subscription. We've cut ops cost at Space Shot 90% and are working on our next 90% reduction to get the ops cost down to the order of the prizes awarded (one so far). Posted by Sam Dinkin at November 28, 2007 03:28 PMold guy: It's me, Sam, who wrote the blog entry. Posted by Sam Dinkin at November 28, 2007 03:30 PMold guy: There is no restriction on notice for the second parenthetic. One could cancel with or without notice effective at the end of the term. Posted by Sam Dinkin at November 28, 2007 03:33 PMSam, I should be honest in saying that I interpret the instructions the way I do, because again, I've been burned by such scams before. I recognize the language, but if I really try to apply logic to the grammar, the wording is confusing. It is one of the nice things about the internet era. For the most part, one can do research and find out about potential vendors in advance. Doesn't always work. On the other hand, customer service industry has gone to hell. Funny how I get surveys all the time, but if I go out of my way to tell them how I really feel... they don't care. Posted by Leland at November 28, 2007 07:26 PMIt may not be pertinent to the conversation, it may not be any of my business, but why did you dump your Vonage Account? Posted by Steve at November 29, 2007 06:02 AMSteve, I found the voice quality on Vonage adequate except for business conference calls. There I don't really even like POTS lines--I have a DSL line. Since I have the DSL line and I haven't made use of the "plug-it-in-anywhere" aspect of the Vonage ip phone, I had no use for it. I found that the fax line couldn't accept a fax with my equipment so I had canceled that a few months before. I redirected all of my traffic for that phone (888-4-Dinkin primarily) to my DSL line, waited make sure I didn't get any calls and did on the DSL line, then canceled it. Posted by Sam Dinkin at November 29, 2007 11:40 AMLeaving a cell contract is simple, just use the majority of your free minutes on a daily basis. Within a month you will receive a warning from the carrier that you are using too many free minutes. If you continue the behavior you will be dropped the next month. Posted by jjs at November 29, 2007 02:04 PMPost a comment |