Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« "Tell The Christians To Come Home" | Main | That Darned Anglosphere »

Northrop Grumman News

This looks like an interesting engine development, but just what is the "critical mission need"? What is the specific application for it?

Posted by Rand Simberg at November 16, 2007 10:06 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/8512

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

Is the mission need the methane/oxygen combination that was going to power the Orion service module, just overcome by events?

Posted by Tom at November 16, 2007 10:38 AM

Didn't Northrop Grumman just acquire TRW? This is that heritage, TR408... It could well have a pintle injector in there. :)

Posted by mz at November 16, 2007 01:14 PM

Been there, done that. Our friends at Orion Propulsion, under contract to HMX for t/Space's CE&R (NASA), did this very same job in 2005. 100 lbs F vac thrust. Pictures are on their website: orionpropulsion

Posted by Gary C Hudson at November 16, 2007 10:13 PM

Methane is a lot easier to keep in a tank than liquid hydrogen. Lower rate of venting to cool it, or much smaller cryo-coolers, take your pick.

On year long interplanetary missions, if you don't want to bleed off half your fuel to keep the other half contained, or run energy expensive active refrigerators, methane is a good way to go.

Besides, it's much denser - less tank per propellant mass even if the propellant is less efficient.

Posted by MRM at November 16, 2007 10:14 PM

Oh, I don't think you'll find much disagreement on the benefits of methane engines here... it's just a question of what drove the funding for this in light of NASA's current fuel choices.

Posted by Big D at November 17, 2007 09:28 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: