|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
You Mean It Wasn't The Aboriginals? Did an extraterrestrial impact cause the Ice Age extinctions? If so, this could be one more motivation to get our act together in terms of finding and managing these things. Posted by Rand Simberg at September 25, 2007 02:18 PMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/8255 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
The journalist who wrote this article needs to do more fact checking next time. The article states that a hydrogen bomb has 100 to 1,000 megaton yield. This is incorrect. Typical yield of a U.S. weapon is 220-250 kilotons. The Soviet bombs were typically 500 kilotons, with some of the gravity bombs (carried by bomber planes) going up to 5 megaton yield. It is mistakes that this that make question the whole article itself. Posted by Kurt9 at September 25, 2007 04:31 PMUm, kurt, you're off by several orders of magnitude. Hydrogen bombs are fusion bombs and do indeed have a yield in the 10 to 100 megaton range; they require a 220-250 kiloton fission bomb just to trigger the fusion bomb in the first place. Posted by Ed Minchau at September 25, 2007 04:49 PMThere was a 20 megaton "Cheyenne Killer" warhead supposedly mounted on a variant of the SS-18. I think we had some 10 megaton bunker busters mounted on Titan IIs. Posted by Mike Puckett at September 25, 2007 05:29 PMThe Soviet superbomb was about 50 MT. It was not deployed. The biggest US bomb in the arsenal was the 25 Mt Mk-41. So the author of piece missed it by more than an order of magnitude. Once you get past these yields, you just end up blowing out the atmosphere into space faster rather than destroying more stuff to paraphrase Edward Teller. I also guess they found a new use for those old discredited TAPS codes Sagan et al used to frighten the populace into disarmament. Posted by K at September 25, 2007 07:00 PMEd, I stand by my point. The largest bomb ever made, but not deployed, was the Soviet Tsar bomb 57MT that was detonated in 1961. Yes, there were gravity bombs on B-52s that went up to 25 MT and the Soviets had some in this range. However, there were not very many of these. Most of the arsenals were in the 250-500 kT range. The largest practical yield for a fission device is around 40 kT. Anything over this yield is fusion. Check out: http://www.cdi.org/nuclear/database/nukestab.html http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/nuclear/index.html Posted by Kurt9 at September 25, 2007 07:38 PMBack to the original point of the news release ... I think it's interesting that as near as I can tell the age of the impact seems to be a bit older than the usual date given for the dieout of the megafauna, 11,700 years bp. Could it be that the impact didn't kill *enough* humans, compared to the critters they were accustomed to hunting? That the number of humans that survived exceeded the diminished carrying capacity of the North American ecosystems? Posted by Mike G in Corvallis at September 25, 2007 10:42 PMThere's an interesting critique of the idea here: http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/news_detail.cfm?ID=176 Posted by Tom at September 26, 2007 06:49 AMYes, this theory appears to be rather ridiculous. Thought they tested fission devices considerably greater than 40 kT - there was some concern that the hydrogen bomb would not work or would be impractical. I suppose all of the fission cores in the U.S. arsenal are part fusion in that they are tritium "boosted." The idea was to miniaturize the weapons as much as possible and make use of MIRV's -- a lot of precisely-targeted small weapons are more potent than a few crudely-targeted large ones. This tritium boosting is an issue with the "decay" of the U.S. arsenal -- didn't they shut down production of tritium? On the other hand, Richard Rhodes described the hydrogen bomb as more fission than anything else with fusion providing the neutrons. Not only do you have a fission trigger, there is that plutonium spark plug in the middle of the fusion assembly, and the U238 jacket to convert fast fusion neutrons into fission yield. The U238 jacket is not to make the bomb "dirty" although it does that -- in its absence, you would have something more akin to the "neutron bomb" with diminished explosive power but enhanced radiation effects. Posted by Paul Milenkovic at September 26, 2007 08:10 PMWell, if the impact or detonation was on or over the several thousand feet thick Laurentide ice sheet, would there necessarily be a crater? On the other hand, wouldn't there be clear evidence in Greenland ice cores? and the U238 jacket to convert fast fusion neutrons into fission yield. It's my understanding that some (most?) US thermonuclear bombs actually have a 235U jacket in the secondary. The fast neutron fission cross section of 235U is about twice that of 238U, IIRC, so this increases the yield/weight ratio, particularly in smaller warheads. Posted by Paul Dietz at September 29, 2007 05:45 PMPost a comment |