Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Missed Opportunity | Main | Carbon LOX Stock and Barrel »

Mysterious Motherboard

Patricia's computer needs more memory. It's got half a gig, but it's being brought to its knees. The board's about four or five years old (I think it's running a 1.8 MHz Athlon). It's got an extra DIMM slot, but I don't know how big a stick it can take. I can't find the mobo manual, but I figured I could find one on line. The only identifier I can see on it says "Micro-Star Model MS-5390." But when I do a search on that, I come up empty. I assume that it's an MSI, but that model number doesn't seem to exist in their data base. Anyone have any idea what's going on? What are the chances that a board of that vintage can't handle a gigbyte stick? I don't want to go out and buy one unless I know it will work. On the other hand, just adding another half a gig would probably solve her problem.

[Update in the late afternoon]

Well, after reviewing the options (buying half a gig for sixty bucks or a full gig for a hundred and ten) and realizing that the memory I was buying would probably be useless on the next upgrade, I decided to bite the bullet and upgrade now. Athlon 64 and a gig of DDR2 for ~$250. I can use the other mobo for a development linux box.

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 21, 2007 07:14 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/7203

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

try http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=MS-6390LE-L&class=mb

Posted by joe at March 21, 2007 07:43 AM

Nope. That board has three memory slots, mine has only two. It definitely says MS-5390. No matter how much I look or squint, I can't see any other number there.

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 21, 2007 07:53 AM

And doing a search for that number at the MSI site says that the "product does not exist." I'd sure like to show it to them.

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 21, 2007 07:55 AM

I would be surprised if a > 1.5 GHz MB can't handle at least 1 GB of memory. Moreover, DIMM slots usually can handle equal levels of memory, and thus total memory size is usually the Max DIMM capacity times number of DIMM slots. Thus if you a single 512MB DIMM, then you should be safe to add a second 512MB DIMM.

Whatever you do, don't go over 2 GB unless you plan on going to a 64-bit OS.

Posted by Leland at March 21, 2007 07:57 AM

BTW, what's with your timestamp? This post is being made at 10:30AM CDT.

Posted by Leland at March 21, 2007 07:59 AM

Your PC CAN handle a 1GB stick. (well 95% chance) Pretty much any PC after the 1.5 Ghz clocked PCs can handle the big memory stick. The only real worry you'll have is finding the correct memory speed.

Posted by Mac at March 21, 2007 08:18 AM

Rand,
your best bet is what Leland said. If it's got a 512, buy another one like it and plunk it in the currently open slot. If the new one is a "faster" stick, it's still better to have twice the memory even at the slower original speed.

Are you sure the one that's in there now is working correctly, or is it going south by degrees and causing this problem?

Posted by Steve at March 21, 2007 08:28 AM

one tool that will give you a definitive answer is SiSoft Sandra, its MOBO information module is really thorough and will tell you right away what it supports and what it doesnt, including memory.

Another thing is, do a memory cleanup in that machine, get yourself a Sysinternals tool suite, and specifically process explorer. Look at what services, startup applications and so on are useless and disproportionally large, and by disabling&uninstalling them it can sometimes work wonders for responsivity and general usability of the machine.

Posted by kert at March 21, 2007 08:53 AM

i forgot to add that both are free tools and what i have been considered essential arsenal on windows machines for many years.

Posted by kert at March 21, 2007 08:58 AM

Like kert said, though I prefer "cpu-z", traditionally, for doing the same thing.

(Though, considering the prices of PCs these days, and the prices of obsolete memory, the marginal cost is probably in favour of a new, faster bottom-end machine.)

Posted by Sigivald at March 21, 2007 09:12 AM

btw, if you boot a WinXP, and after login you are using more than 150 memory, i consider it a bloated setup which needs cleanup ( except on laptops which traditionally add startup stuff installed by OEM )

i keep my desktop @ 120 megs in use at startup, and win2003 server at around ~200, running development webserver, database server and a few other services.

Posted by kert at March 21, 2007 09:20 AM

Actually that board supports two memory slots and 3 PCI slots.

Main Memory
• Support four memory banks using two 184-pin DDR DIMM.
• Support a maximum memory size of 2 GB
• Support 2.5v DDR SDRAM DIMM.


Posted by joe at March 21, 2007 09:24 AM

There's nothing wrong with the existing memory--it's just inadequate for her computing needs. I went out looking for additional memory, and couldn't find anything in a 512 less than 400, whereas this is 266. It seems to be using a Via chipset, so with a little research, I'm 99% confident that it can handle a gig in a slot. So if I can find a one gig 333, I'll probably go with that. The only other option is to replace board, processor and memory (I could upgrade to a 2.6G Sempron for about $200 total--board, memory, processor--though I'd have to get a new video card as well, because it's getting hard to find a board with AGP any more).

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 21, 2007 09:27 AM

D'oh!

You're probably right, in relooking at it. That probably is the board (I was looking at the PCI slots and thinking I was looking at memory). It does look very much like it. I guess that "6" just looks like a "5."

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 21, 2007 09:37 AM

Various memory makers have a guided lookup for RAM.

www.kingston.com (just an example, there are others), you select MSI from the manufacturer list, then look for the MS-6390 (listed, primarily as MS-KM266). Highlight the entry, press the "search" button.

http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator_new/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=&mfr=&model=&root=us&LinkBack=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kingston.com&Sys=12247-MSI-KM266+%28MS-6390%29%2FMS-6390%2FMS-6390LE-L+%28MS-6390%29&distributor=0&submit1=Search

is what I got.

Try with your favorite memory manufacturer.

Posted by bloatboy at March 21, 2007 09:50 AM

btw, if you boot a WinXP,

I wouldn't know. I boot up W2K.

Posted by Rand Simberg at March 21, 2007 09:56 AM

Go to memoryx.com and try the 'Check Your Computer' button. They sell older stuff too.

Posted by Mark at March 21, 2007 11:35 AM

I have always had good, though not perfect, luck typing the BIOS ID string into Google and letting it poke through the BIOS maker's data pages. If you find a reference to the whole string, it's almost always specific to a particular motherboard make and model, and the BIOS manufacturers obviously know which is which.

Regards,
Ric

Posted by Ric Locke at March 21, 2007 06:03 PM

You made a good decision. It's better if the board supports dual cores, but you didn't provide enough information.

Posted by Leland at March 22, 2007 05:32 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: