Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« CYA Home Security | Main | Wanna Get Rich? »

Mile-High Skyscrapers

They're on the way. But not in the US, or at least, not in New York.

And you won't get me into one of them.

Posted by Rand Simberg at February 24, 2007 09:25 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/7006

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

If Liftport or Black Line Ascension have their way, there will be a 60 thousand mile high skyscraper.

Posted by Ed Minchau at February 24, 2007 09:56 AM

Like Ed, I was going to say that carbon nanotube technology will allow for contruction of structures way taller than a mile. If they can build a 60,000 mile high beanstock, they can certainly put up something 2-3 miles high (and 2-3 miles deep to sit on the ocean floor, depending on how resistant nanotube are to sea water corrosion).

In any case, the economics of most places do not justify such high buildings. Based on stuff like ventilation and utility constraints, the economic break points of high-rise construction are at around 11-12 floors, 40 floors, and around 70-75 floors. This is why most place have a lot of building around these heights and few higher.

Nonetheless, we all know that tall buildings, like Ferrari sports cars, are the substitute phallises of choice. Its the old "mine's bigger than yours" thing. So, developers will continue to build them higher and higher as long as someone is willing to pay for them.

Posted by Kurt9 at February 24, 2007 02:49 PM

Does Brad Edwards start a new space elevator company every other year? How many is he up to now?

Posted by sickofspacelevator at February 24, 2007 03:55 PM

Of course, it doesn't exactly hurt that the tower currently under construction most likely to take the crown is in a country that the terrorists come from, not attack.

Posted by Fletcher Christian at February 24, 2007 08:11 PM

I think the towers of Diaspar were more than a mile high, possibly two miles.

Posted by lmg at February 24, 2007 09:36 PM

There is plent y of internal terrorism inside arab countries.

Shitte vs sunni, Islamists vs royalists,

Nationalists vs monarchists

heck, jewish terrorists blew up rabin,
but Simberg won't ever talk about that.

Posted by anonymous at February 25, 2007 03:08 PM

And yet strangely, with all the terrorists, Burj Al Arab is still standing.

Perhaps al-Qaeda appreciates good architecture?

Posted by Adrasteia at February 25, 2007 05:31 PM

Reason to worry about the US: At one time, any child could proudly tell you that the Empire State Building was the world's tallest. Even King Kong could find it! Today most Americans don't know, much less care that the tallest building is made in Taiwan. (My pictures of Taipei 101 appeared June 19-20)

Posted by Louise at February 25, 2007 08:04 PM

That's because Taipei 101 is quite possibly the single most ugly skyscraper ever built.

Posted by Adrasteia at February 26, 2007 05:17 AM

Adrasteia:

I was thinking the same thing! That is one butt-ugly building. The others pictured in the linked article are a mixed bag -- Sears is also the kind of building which attracts tenants so they won't have to see it from their windows, but some of the others are quite elegant. The Federation Tower and the Korean project both have a really appealing world-of-tomorrow look.

Posted by Cambias at February 26, 2007 06:16 AM

Heck, a Palestinian terrorist assassinated RFK, but anonymous won't ever talk about that.

Posted by Jay Manifold at February 26, 2007 11:37 AM

A mile high building? They'll have to bite the bullet and make provisions for organized BASE jumping, or else they'll have to spend $$$ on extra security. Those folks are nutz.

Posted by Doug Jones at February 26, 2007 12:47 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: