Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« New Space Company | Main | Poetry, Not Argument »

The New Partner

RpK has replaced OSC with Andrews. They'll take over some of the systems engineering and integration work, and will be making an investment. So another one of the unsuccessful COTS bidders gets back in the game, through the back door.

[Update a few minutes later]

Clark Lindsey has a press release.

[Update at 5:30 PM EDT]

And here's a more extensive article on not only the Jim Benson announcement, but on NewSpace in general. Bottom line (buried in the middle of the article)--investors are starting to take this industry seriously.

Mr. Benson says he "managed to raise $1 million with less than a dozen phone calls." Some investors said yes without ever seeing a formal proposal, he says. "If I had tried three or four years ago to solicit money for this kind of private space flight, I wouldn't have had any luck."

Not much giggling left.

Alan Boyle has more.

And yes, I really do have some thoughts on this stuff, but I'm saving them for a couple articles I'm working on, for TCS Daily and The New Atlantis.

Posted by Rand Simberg at September 28, 2006 01:33 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/6277

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

it's an article originally from the wall street journal.
Now a million in startup capital isn't much to do a
billion dollar problem

Posted by anonymous at September 28, 2006 03:07 PM

Where does this leave SpaceDev?

Posted by Mike Puckett at September 28, 2006 04:06 PM

Bah, there's plenty of giggling left for Rocketplane Kistler and Jim Benson.

He wants to build an orbital vehicle and he's only raised $1m in venture capital? Who the hell is he kidding?

Posted by Chris Mann at September 28, 2006 04:15 PM

What makes this problem a "billion dollar" problem? And what's wrong with a million dollars? That's pretty good for high tech startups. More than enough to figure out how to create a space tourism business. Maybe even bend a little metal.

Let's look at what has been done. There's various launch vehicles already capable of putting people into space. The Soyuz is ready to gowhile the Atlas V doesn't appear to need that much work, the crew vehicle is the big missing part. Bigelow is in the process of demonstrating viable space-side living quarters, ie, "the destination".

It appears to me that there will be a lot of potential infrastructure in place or available to a would-be startup. So in particular, there doesn't seem to be a great need for capital early on. And from what little I've observed of startups, it doesn't appear to be a great idea to throw lots of money at a new startup. That doesn't seem to improve the chances that the company will be viable.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at September 28, 2006 05:50 PM

Our anonymous cowardly moron is, as usual, completely clueless about business.

Posted by Rand Simberg at September 28, 2006 06:19 PM

Simberg

How much do you think it will take to build an Orbital
capable multi passenger vehicle.

Posted by anonymous at September 28, 2006 07:21 PM

Strawman argument Anonymous Coward!

JB lefto to go suborbital, not orbital.

Reading comprehension is fundamental.

Posted by Mike Puckett at September 29, 2006 06:17 PM

Strawman argument Anonymous Coward!
JB lefto to go suborbital, not orbital.

It's not a strawman argument, he merely didn't RTFA (neither did I) and realise that the Dream Chaser is no longer being designed as an orbital vehicle.

It's understandable that we'd be confused, in every press release before now it was stated to be an OV.

Posted by Chris Mann at September 29, 2006 11:13 PM

DreamChaser was sized as the HL-20 aeroform,
and proposed for COTS. To suddenly reposition it
as a Suborbital platform is to say the least startling to me.

I'll have to see what they are proposing to do, in terms of
payload, mission, and sortie rate, before i guess what the
costs are. Somewhere between $50M and $500M.

The other question is does it make sense to use the HL-20
planform in this mission. Again without seeing a trajectory
it could be anywhere from Marginal to Insane.

Design of Aerospace vehicles is really hard, there are a lot of
funny things that bite you, and it's damned hard for the
lay public to undrstand, given there is a lack of
engineering experience in this field.

Consequently con-artists, shysters and the merely
deluded operate without any base of people to tell them to
go f#$% off.

Posted by anonymous at September 30, 2006 03:38 PM

JB always said he wanted the Dream Chaser to first see life as a Suborbital Vehicle.

This is not the shocking new development you make it to be.

Him taking it and leaving SpaceDev is the shocking development.

Why leave your own company?

Research is also fundamental.

Posted by Mike Puckett at September 30, 2006 06:34 PM

if i were going to guess, SpaceDev probably has large
shareholders who don't want to be diluted
by the equity requirements for building a
spaceship.

Posted by anonymous at October 1, 2006 06:07 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: