Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Exposing The Lies | Main | Spreading The Word »

Taking It Off The Market

Here's an interesting strategy--Ford is considering taking the company private. That could help a lot, if they have the cash to do it.

Posted by Rand Simberg at August 24, 2006 12:14 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/6086

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

What they need to do, in my humble opinion, is stop working on the hydrogen car that is always 20 years out and instead work on a hybrid/diesel SUV.

The people want SUVs, they are simply too perfectly fit for the soccer moms to ignore yet people want to help the environment and get better gas mileage and all. A hybrid/diesel SUV could have most of that. Yeah you won't get the full benefit of the hybrid with such a large vehicle but it can't hurt (can it?) and diesel not only gets better gas mileage but in many cases can shift over to biodiesel when that gets ready.

Think two years out not twenty and give the people what they want, not just black. It's not rocket science.

Posted by rjschwarz at August 24, 2006 02:23 PM

Um, why would that help? Taking it private so that you can ignore the street - how is that different from just ignoring the street?

Shareholder lawsuits?

Posted by David Summers at August 24, 2006 03:33 PM

Aside from changing the focus from what Wall Street demands (short term gains) to long term goals, going private has the huge benefit of bypassing the SOX accounting regulations. For a company the size of Ford, bypassing the SOX documentation requirements alone would probably save them $1-2 million a month.

Weather going private would buy Ford enough time to keep out of bankrupcy is a whole different question.

Posted by TL at August 24, 2006 03:49 PM

The problem any large hybrid SUV runs into is how buyers look at numbers. It may have a 40% increase in gas milage over a gas engine with similar power, but that is only going to take a 16 mpg SUV to 22 mpg. Most buyers see 6 mpg not 40% more efficent. It's difficult to justify an extra $4000+ to only get 6 mpg better.

Posted by TL at August 24, 2006 04:06 PM

Agree with the diesel SUV hybrid marketing idea. Better than a gas hybrid. Add in electronic innovations like charging the battery via potential energy yield when coasting downhill.

US car companies have no viable marketing. I'm not referring to sales support marketing which they spend all their efforts on but product innovation market ideas that would differentiate the product and give them a competitive edge.

Posted by philw at August 24, 2006 04:36 PM

Ford's problems stem from its bloated cost structure and the fact that it makes cars that are impossible to sell without massive incentives to the consumer. Those are its fundamental structural problems. Ford will continue to languish and eventually die unless it fixes them. Ditto for GM.

Posted by Jardinero1 at August 24, 2006 06:24 PM

Ford's problems stem from its bloated cost structure and the fact that it makes cars that are impossible to sell without massive incentives to the consumer.

I look at those incentives and can't help but wonder, "Why don't you just lower the @#$!ing price!?"

Posted by McGehee at August 24, 2006 07:21 PM

For a company the size of Ford, bypassing the SOX documentation requirements alone would probably save them $1-2 million a month.

Based on my experience with SOX at a public company with revenue of 'only' 1 billion per year (give or take) that feels like a very low figure.

Posted by Brian at August 24, 2006 09:23 PM

So how does "going private" help get rid of the UAW?

Posted by K at August 24, 2006 10:47 PM

"Agree with the diesel SUV hybrid marketing idea. Better than a gas hybrid. Add in electronic innovations like charging the battery via potential energy yield when coasting downhill. "

Hydraulic hybrids are cheaper. Why does everything have to have batteries? It's just another part of the car to 'vent with flame' in a crash.

Posted by Chris Mann at August 25, 2006 01:30 AM

I think the SOX laws may be the real culprit. I'm with Brian that the cost of meeting the requirements is high. Most of my companies' contracts are with the federal government, and the various agencies have different accounting methods. Yet, to be SOX compliance, we are having to standardize our accounting methods across business units. Otherwise, we still have to do the old "voodoo" accounting to reconcile, which is no longer allowed.

Posted by Leland at August 25, 2006 05:15 AM

When do you think SOX will go away? Across the SP500, I'd bet we are wasting $10B on it a year - and does anyone think that it really will make a diference to a con artist?

Posted by David Summers at August 25, 2006 08:36 AM

"Based on my experience with SOX at a public company with revenue of 'only' 1 billion per year (give or take) that feels like a very low figure."

I'm assuming that Ford's size would bring some economies of scale in dealing with SOX issues, but Brian is probably correct that I am lowballing the estimate. A lot would depend on how fragmented their accounting system(s) are to start out with. Working for a $17 billion per year company that has done a lot of aquisitions over the last decade I could easily see multiplying the SOX budget by four if there are a lot of legacy systems.

Posted by TL at August 25, 2006 03:19 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: