Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Space Access Live | Main | Conference Update »

Obvious Scientific Result Break

I haven't seen a lot worth reporting since the wireless came back up, but I did run across this piece, in the "bears use the woods as a toilet" category, which claims--hold on to your hats, now--that men influenced by attractive women don't always make great decisions:

"We all think we are rational beings, but our research suggests ... that people with high testosterone levels are very vulnerable to sexual cues. If there are no cues around, they behave normally, but if they see sexual images they become impulsive..."

What would we do without researchers?

Posted by Rand Simberg at April 21, 2006 05:53 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/5391

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

I'd actually encourage more research into this area, as I'm getting sick and tired of the post-modern feminists who insist that they should be able to wear short skirts, open blouses and f-me pumps to work and we men should treat them as androgynes.

There's a reason that men cover up to their necks and wrists in proper business attire. In my opinion, if women expect to be treated with the same professional deference as male colleagues then they should cover up as much.

Now we're seeing more than the overwhelming anecdotal common-knowledge of the distracting nature of cleavage and ankles, now we're getting the "scientific" "proof" of what we all already know.

Posted by ken murphy at April 21, 2006 09:01 PM

The second line in the story is even more interesting:

"The finding is unwelcome confirmation that those most likely to be in a position of power are most susceptible to the subtle influences of the opposite sex."

I wonder which President this could be referring to?

Although the notion that power seeking is a function of testosterone level is just blatant sexism. And from a British lefty newspaper too. Tsk tsk.

Posted by K at April 21, 2006 10:44 PM

Next breaking news: Researchers have found in a ten-year, $10 million survey that bears sh*t in the woods.

Posted by Ian Campbell at April 22, 2006 06:06 AM

Ken, I wouldn't be surprised to find that the "feminists" in question already knew the distracting power of cleavage.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at April 22, 2006 06:35 AM

South Park "bebe's boobs destroy civilization" I think is the title.

Scientists are WAY behind the curve, either that, or. . . .
. . .
Are Matt and Trey social Scientists?

I'm confused. BOOBIES GOOD! BOOBIES GOOD!
Napster BAD!

Posted by wickedpinto at April 23, 2006 01:41 PM

Oh, and this just in.

Young men tend to react poorly to rejection.

Posted by wickedpinto at April 23, 2006 01:42 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: