|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
Virgin Galactic Survey Virgin Galactic mailed me a survey which you can access. Answer truthfully. I (owner of SpaceShot) am not like the competitors that Julian Simon talks about in his mailorder books that tries to muck up competitors' surveys. They inquire about pricing for Virgin Galactic Quest in $10 increments from 0-60+. Drop me a line at transterrestrial@dinkin.com or comment what you think tournament entries for a trip to space should cost. Also tell me what kind of profit margin you think would be fair. And whether a bundle of more than one entry would be OK. Note that credit card fixed charges are $0.30 + 2-3% at paypal which has a restrictive skill games policy and $0.40 or more elsewhere so credit cards will eat up 6-7% of a $10 charge, but only 4-5% of a $20 charge. Can someone give me a quote for the cost of building and analyzing one of those surveys? (I don't want to buy one, just validate my decision not to.) Posted by Sam Dinkin at March 03, 2006 08:57 AMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/5050 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
Hi Sam I guess I'm qualified to answer that. I used to be Market Research Manager for one of Britain's largest gambling businesses, and was then did a fair bit of NPD research for a large lottery operator. Currenlty build predictive models based on MR. Off the bat - traditional market research techniques are tricky when it comes to any form of gaming or wagering. This is particularly true of price sensitivty research. As the price changes the product (price and odds) also changes. Also as volumes change (more sales) then so to does the price and product! This very close coupling of price/prize/volumes make for a highly non-linear and inherently difficult to forecast market dynamic. Classical price sensitivity methods simply don't work. Wagering/gaming is also a potentially sensitive area for some people, not only from an outright rejectionist point of view, but also gambling is deeply deeply irrational and man is a rationalising animal. When asked what we do and why, we will rationalise our all ready existing prejudices. When asked to explain illogical behaviour in any form of market research instrument we suffer cognitive dissonance and without lying tell untruths. The above does not mean that meaningful insights can't be generated by MR, but they can't be generated by run of the mill approaches. I'm guessing your mail out/mail in survey from Virgin was using registered interested parties as the sampling frame. If this survey was managed internally then the total cost will be the printing and postage, plus a bit of time for a secretary to bash the results into excel. Don't even get me started on why this approach may not be ideal, but in terms of bits of data per pound spend you can't beat it. The next step up the ladder would be buying a couple of runs of questions on one of the big omnibus surveys. You can usually ask a nicely balanced random sample of 1000 a couple of closed yes/no questions, a run of likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) questions, and an open write in question for a low thousands. You would get your results back as a nice set of cross tabs with all the usual demographics breaks (age/gender/region/education/ethnicity etc) For a few hundred more the supplier could run off cross tables to order (three way age by sex by region for example). A lot of the ommibuses also ask a standard bank of attitudinal questions as well so you can get breaks against questions like "how likely to take a risk you are". The next step would be to use one of the specialist omnibuses - for example there are omnibus surveys that specifically sample the young/the rich/ the asian ... whatever. Then you would be into some purchasing some one off survey work. Here you would be knees deep in crafting your own sampling frame; setting detailed research objectives; building predictive models and segmentations by attitude. You would certainly need your project managed and overseen by a professional. It's been a while since I did one of these but for a full-on usage and attitude survey with detailed modelling you would be looking at c50,000. The bulk of that cost would be for the time the various research specialists would have to spend on your project. I'm afraid stuff like that is not cheap. These prices are all UK, but they can translate pretty simply to US. Internet vs mail vs phone isn't going to make a massive difference on price. Just pick the approach that suits you research objectives. Really really fancy stuff like full immersive research, anthropological approaches etc etc can cost into the millions. Hope this helps Post a comment |