Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« The Fool's Golden State | Main | Prisoner Abuse Photos From Iraq »

Cognitive Dissonance

This article is a few weeks old, but I missed it at the time--Max Borders writes about the Intelligent Design theories of the left.

Posted by Rand Simberg at February 17, 2006 05:46 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/4977

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

If I had to name the one most important concept in science, it would be "creative destruction." It's how evolution works; it's how quantum field theory (and therefore physics except for relativity) works; it's how economics works (when it works); it's how democracy works (to the extent it works); and it's how science works.

Unfortunately, as Max Borders's article illustrates, far more people passionately advocate particular applications of creative destruction, than understand the concept of creative destruction. Apparently, no large group consistently believes in the concept.

Posted by Bob Hawkins at February 17, 2006 04:19 PM

"Indeed, if ever there were a view of economics that builds in the blind, purposeless processes of trial-and-error, specialization, and complexity (the hallmarks of the Darwinian algorithm) it is Smith’s invisible-hand economics"

Not surprising, since Darwin's formulation was directly shaped by reading Smith and Malthus.

Posted by Ken Summers at February 18, 2006 08:09 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: