Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« I Did Not Know That | Main | More On SpaceX »

It's Not Tax Cuts

Listening to the "Beltway Boys" on Brit Hume's show brings to mind an ongoing frustration with the debate.

Look, tax-rate cut fans (both libertarian and conservatives).

Expunge completely from your vocabulary the phrase "tax cuts." There's no sensible way to talk about this concept, because it's an impossible task. The government has no power to reduce taxes, at least when it comes to income. All that it can do is to reduce tax rates. Reducing tax rates doesn't necessarily result in reduced taxes, and increasing tax rates doesn't necessarily result in increased taxes.

It's like the video games that allow you to control velocity, but not position. Actually, it's not even like that, because physics is physics, and you can learn how to get somewhere with a velocity controller, but economics is unpredictable.

Those of us who want to promote economic growth have to change the vocabulary, and get people to stop talking about "tax cuts," because there's no such thing in any predictable way. Doing so may make it easier to persuade people to support lower rates, and an increase in wealth for everyone.

Posted by Rand Simberg at November 18, 2005 10:19 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/4527

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

Good point. The use of the proper word can be
very powerful political medicine in the media age.

"Bum"="Homeless person".


Define the terms and you've got the half the battle won.

Posted by K at November 18, 2005 11:42 PM

Unfortunately, most of the war is already lost.

A reduction in the planned rate of increase of spending in future years is now called a budget cut.

It's going to take a lot of work.

Posted by Big D at November 19, 2005 04:42 AM

A few years ago I would have thought it was impossible to change the terminology thrown around in the press--when reductions in welfare benefit increases were routinely labeled 'cuts' in the MSM. I guess this still happens to some degree, but I have noticed a reduction lately--perhaps it's the influence of bloggers and alt media.
It does seem half of motivating spineless GOP congressmen is framing the debate positively for them. Usually the White House has to do this, which means it rarely happens.

Now if only if the RNC would get on board with this kind of stuff...

Posted by cuddihy at November 21, 2005 12:15 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: