Michael Mealing is chairing a session on various brief presentations of potentially interesting technical concepts.

First up is fellow Transterrestrial blogger Sam Dinkin, who is talking about Spaceshot, his new company that is making a skill game that will offer a prize of a ride on Rocketplane. The game will be a non-dexterity skill game. Tickets will be less than five dollars, the flights will start in 2007, and they will also provide money to pay taxes for the flight. Not a game of chance (poker, lottery drawing). Examples of skill games are tennis or chess. Idea is to increase demand, and offer space travel to the less well heeled (nine billion dollars spent on Halloween each year--wants to tap that kind of money).

Someone from Frontier Astronautics (didn't get the name) is up now. He recently quit Lockheed Martin to form his own company with three or four other people. They're selling attitude control systems and rocket engines. Their first customer is Masten, to whom they're selling attitude control. Still looking for a first customer for their rocket engine, 7500 pounds of thrust, liquid oxygen and kerosene.

Alex Bucolari (sp?) is a student at Dartmouth, and is working on beamed propulsion systems. Planning to beam vehicles to orbit from the ground, either with thermal rocket or pulsed ablation (they're working on the former). High specific impulse , about 800 seconds (Nerva class) and hydrogen propellant. Using a 1 kW System with cylindrical resonance chamber. Working with Kevin Parkin at JPL/Caltech. Plans to build clustered array for orbital system.

Berin Szoka has developed a public policy think tank to reduce regulatory roadblocks to space, and will be dedicated to do this in Washington. He's a lawyer with a background in the DC policy world. He thinks that this community needs a professional organization, like Cato, to deal specifically with these issues. Still looking for funding to get it going, and wants feedback on our priorities. Focus now is on ITAR but will work other issues. Will not lobby, but will provide intellectual ammunition for the foot soldiers on the Hill and in the administration.

Phil Chapman points out three recent developments in SPS development: methane hydrates (enough to meet all the world's energy needs for at least a thousand years) which will put a ceiling on the price of electricity (SPS will have to beat $.04/kW-hr); artificial thin-films of diamond are turning out to be easy to make as thermionic conversion devices, which may make for cheap and light SPS; they have a design for an SPS that is isoinertial, allowing easy pointing at the sun as it goes around the earth.

Steve Harrington of Flometrics is talking about his pistonless pumps, which will reduce cost, weight of engines, and increase reliability. He has a demo in the exhibit area, and he used one to pump a low-concentration alchohol-based rocket fuel (also known as margaritas) at the Space Access conference. He's going to do it again tonight. I will attend the demonstration.

James Schulz of Space Resources, Inc. is talking about his company, which is looking at building large-scale platforms in LEO for commercial uses. They are looking at a three-phase approach: customers first, then transportation, then construction. Expecting it to be customer-driven concept that will lead to large amounts of in-space construction, because best way to stimulate business in orbit is large-scale habitable platforms and labs. Need to start now to be ready when vehicles are ready. Looking for people who share the vision. He doesn't see himself as in competition with Bigelow--sees his timeframe as farther out. Expects developing customer base will take three years, and transportation will take several years beyond that. Market is envisioned to be corporate users. Analogy is building a shopping center, and they're indifferent to what business occupy it.

Alliance for Commercial Enterprise In Space (ACES) by Bruce Pittman. Addressing demand (in biotech area). Biotech needs throughput, and they don't like dealing with NASA. Looking for mechanisms in public-private partnerships that can help show how NASA can work (started with Ames, but also working with other NASA centers, including manned spaceflight centers) Four pillars that ACES supports: supply, demand, capital, and public policy.

Manny Pimente has a company called "Lunar Explorer" completing the development phase of a virtual reality simulation of the moon. Looking for high fidelity. Want to shrink the moon so that it fits into a computer at home. Allows people to "walk" along the surface. Modeling Apollo and other landing sites. Trying to extract more value from data gathered in the past by programs like Clementine, particularly for kids. They've raised $300K to date and are looking for more money.

Alan Crider working with Tom Taylor and Lunar Outpost will provide labs on the moon, for NASA and private enterprise (Lunar Base Systems). Uses both inflatable technology and retrofitting existing technology, to land bases anywhere on the moon. No data on weight of the base (guessing about a hundred tons).

Steve Knight (sp?) is looking at non-traditional corporate approaches to avoid middle management. Started thinking about it after Challenger, in which a pyramid of information flow restricted knowledge at the top and made for bad decisions. Started using internal contracting and decision markets a year or so ago as a new way of building high-tech knowledge infrastructure to build high-tech companies. Will have more case histories to show us next year. Casting a wider net to find people interested. Says to keep an eye on trac.t7a.org for updates in the coming weeks.

Joe Caroll, of tether fame, had developed a new interest, and thinks that most of the people buying seats will be tourists. Has new passenger vehicle designs, but doesn't want to be a big company, so is offering his ideas (patentable) to people who want to see a tourism-oriented practical vehicle happen.

Derek Shannon, finishing up masters at USC, and working on urban transit program (very spacy) and a renewable energy project--an alternative to the DoE Tokamak program. Not cold fusion, but an interesting new approach.

Day's sessions are almost over, and I need to take a break.

re: "fellow Transterrestrial blogger Sam Dinkin"

I believe that should read "fellow Transterrestrial Muser Sam Dinkin" ;)

Rand,
The guy who was talking about non-traditional corporate approaches is Steve Traugott, not Steve Knight. Steve's company, TerraLuna runs the incubator that MSS is currently part of. His shop is right nextdoor to ours.
~Jon

Nuclear electricity in the US with new plants should be around $.03/kWh (2003 dollars). See this link. I doubt clathrate methane would be competitive for baseload power, the market nuclear would be serving.

"methane hydrates (enough to meet all the world's energy needs for at least a thousand years)"

Has there been a recent breaktrhough in extracting methane from them? I've discussed this with a friend in the "all bidness" here in Texas and he didn't know of any breaktrhoughs. From what I could tell, oil tars were getting much more attention.

Also, SPS and nuclear power are non-greenhouse solutions. (And the evidence for some forms of human-induced global warming are increasing. Even the oil companies are preparing to shift from fuel sales to chemicals in a big way.)