Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Computer Woes | Main | Maybe They're Right »

Misplaced Parentage

Jack Parsons is an interesting character in the history of American rocketry, but it's a major slight to the memory of Dr. Robert Goddard to call Parsons the father of it.

Posted by Rand Simberg at June 01, 2005 06:26 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/3844

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

It is really only the title that uses that term, and oftentimes editors (who usually choose titles) know much less about a subject than the writers, and make dumb mistakes.

The book review itself, however, also goes a little overboard. I have not read the book, and I don't know much about Parsons, but the review implies that much of his work was with solid propellants, not liquids. Is this true?

Finally, we should remember that biographers tend to oversell their subjects. It is partly the nature of biography (after all, if you don't love your subject, then why are you writing about him?), and partly the requirements of selling a book. So hyping his importance to American rocketry is not that surprising.

Posted by Kelly Hsu at June 1, 2005 11:22 AM

He was unquestionably very important to the history of American rocketry (and yes, he was heavily involved with the development of useful solid propellants), but it's overstating it by quite a bit to call him its "father," when we have Robert Goddard.

Posted by Rand Simberg at June 1, 2005 11:40 AM

Rand, the link for the Reason site doesn't work now. Perhaps the changed/removed it?

Posted by VR at June 1, 2005 05:39 PM

Sorry, should be fixed now.

Posted by Rand Simberg at June 1, 2005 05:51 PM

Parsons' most important achievement, from what I read, was his invention of the first castable solid fuel, while involved in early JATO research. Not a small thing; before that, the science of preparing solid fuels was a very risky art, not really very far removed from what Roger Bacon as up to centuries ago.

I have some problems with calling Goddard a "father" either, though, in view of his secretiveness and profound disinclination to collaboration. People were forced to independently recreate a lot of Goddard's work because of it.

Parsons: American rocketry's crazy uncle. Goddard: American rocketry's negligent dad.

Posted by Bruce at June 2, 2005 02:09 PM

According to the book, Theodore Von Karman said Goddard was so secretive and solitary that he constituted a branch of American rocketry that died out.

Posted by Robin at June 3, 2005 05:17 PM

nkrcx powhgxytl nrawldme wyfnxvec vbphjsfqg arsxpuw gwopatef

Posted by klqfe wnip at November 10, 2006 07:03 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: