|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
No Consensus John Podhoretz says that the Revenge of the Sith, well, sux. But here's a much different (and longer) opinion, with lots of spoilers, for those who care about such things. I have trouble worrying about spoilers for a movie like this. I mean, even someone with the minimal mental acuity of Jar Jar Binks ought to be able to intelligently interpolate between movies 2 and 4, such that the major plot points are obvious. The only question is how well Lucas pulls them all off. Posted by Rand Simberg at May 10, 2005 10:08 AMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/3789 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
I agree about the spoilers inasmuch as everyone has to know that Anakin becomes Darth Vader by the end of the movie (it's in every preview, too). Kinda like we knew that some time between the end of Ep. 1 and the end of Ep 3, Anakin would lose one of his hands (happened in Ep. 2). Any spoilers I can think of aren't plot points, but, as you mentioned, the details about how those plots are fleshed out. That's the only way that the movie can hope to bring in money, since everyone knows how it ends. Any spoilers about those details would be a little unwelcomed, IMHO. Posted by John Breen III at May 10, 2005 11:11 AMThanks for the spoiler warning Rand. I appreciate it. Posted by Karl Hallowell at May 10, 2005 11:46 AMI've never quite understood the problem with spoilers (must be something to do with my personality type, INTJ.) As Rand points out, by interpolation, episode 3 must have certain plot points. All other movies can be extrapolated... something from the multitude of all possibilities must occur and the most likely can usually be determined before the opening credits have finished. Surprise of course is fun, but I find that I enjoy a good movie the tenth time more than I did the first. It may be that I'm just strange? The Matrix, for instance, is a movie crying to be rewritten. In the multiverse (a ridiculous attempt by physicists to deny the existance of God) I can imagine some truly great plot diversions. btw, all spelling and grammer errors are simply the result of drifting between quantum states... I'm actually perfect in my own little universe. ;) Posted by ken anthony at May 10, 2005 01:20 PMGiven that the last time I checked (some time in the early 80's) I was an INTJ too (and my attitudes on spoilers haven't changed since then), we must look elsewhere for the excuse. In my case, it really does lower the enjoyment of the film, if I know (or have a good idea) of what's going to happen next. I rarely watch a movie again in a short period of time. The Matrix, for instance, is a movie crying to be rewritten. In the multiverse (a ridiculous attempt by physicists to deny the existance of God) I can imagine some truly great plot diversions. I sense that this paragraph resides in a different reality from myself. :-) While the Matrix is probably a decent example due to the overall complexity of the film, I still find it hard to concentrate on a film where I've seen so much of it before. And what's this about the "multiverse"? Not a standard physics concept and even if it were, how does this result in a feeble attempt to "deny" the existence of a god or gods? I am confused. I think having been overexposed in my youth to Hollywood output, I may have adapted out of necessity to become more spoiler-tolerant simply because it got to be excruciatingly rare for anything out of Hollywood to surprise me. Then I got older and the memory started to go, and now spoilers don't bother me in the least. Especially if I have no intention of dropping $40 so my wife and I can see the movie in a theater, each with a modest handful of snacks and a soda. Posted by McGehee at May 12, 2005 01:59 PMKarl, the long version is here. The many worlds theory is pretty standard in quantum physics. It was popularized in sliders and quantum leap. Posted by ken anthony at May 15, 2005 10:06 PMPost a comment |