Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« ISDC Time | Main | ICC highlights, Day 1 »

Nuclear Waste Solutions

Andrew, my very first Fox News column, a couple of years ago, was on this very subject.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 24, 2004 09:49 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/2451

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

Put nuclear waste on the Moon? Didn't you watch Space: 1999?!

:)

Posted by Rick C at May 25, 2004 08:49 AM

We (the US) decided to NOT process spent fuel as a matter of law in the late 70s.

A reactor consumes fuel and in the process it produces poisions. Poisions absorb neutrons and reduce the power generating capacity of the reactor. A poisoned reactor may still have significant quantities of fuel that is suitable for use. Reprocessing the fuel can recover useful fuel and reduce waste. We currently through away the good fuel and the poisons together. This is wasteful.

The French, Germans, and Japanese all reprocess their fuel. The technology exists. The problem is, like so many problems in engineering, a political problem.

Later,
Jason from Seattle

Posted by Jason from Seattle at May 25, 2004 12:07 PM

Yup. Processed high-level waste is no more radioactive than the original ore within 600 years. It should be handled with care, certainly, but the risk is small if done properly.
Space launch adds a great deal of risk, just because it could drop on somebody's head.

Compare that to the megatons of solid waste produced by coal power plants, and the rest of the stuff put into the air by all fossil power plants. Add in mining and transportation and nuclear is just a lot cleaner than fossil, even ignoring CO2 production. If I could, I would move us to passively safe nuclear power plants and rational fuel reprocessing. The total waste produced would be small - I'd stick it in a cavern and guard the entrance. In 50 years or so when we learned how to properly use it, I'd bring it back out.

Posted by VR at May 25, 2004 02:40 PM

free poker Have a nice day! :)

Posted by free poker at February 5, 2006 10:45 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: