Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Finally | Main | Too Cool for Words »

What Would Ross Perot Think?

Just when you thought that the Reform Party couldn't get any more incoherent and lacking in principles of any variety, it endorses Ralph Nader. Recall that their last presidential candidate was Patrick J. Buchanan.

What a joke.

It's good news for Bush, though--it will put Nader on the ballot in a lot of states he wouldn't otherwise get.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 12, 2004 12:30 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/2410

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

OTOH, it does indicate to me that Nader probably will appeal to conservatives better than he did last time around when he was strictly a Green party candidate. I think more generally that if there is a successful third party candidate, this will be the approach they have to use. Namely, picking up endorsements from the larger third parties together with really weak candidates from the two big parties.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at May 12, 2004 06:17 PM

Karl, how do you figure? Regardless of party, Nader is still Nader.

The Reform Party label may net him votes of some people right-of-center, but those Buchanan voters are no more likely to turn out for Bush than for Kerry, so it's a wash.

Posted by McGehee at May 12, 2004 06:37 PM

Cant say it speaks well for Bush's prospects that Nader getting onto a few ballots is worth calling good news.

Posted by Nathan H, at May 12, 2004 08:14 PM

Nathan:

Look at it this way: If Nader DIDN'T get on ballots, the Kerry people (at this point) would be noting that this was "good news".

Unless it's a blow-out (and it's almost certainly too early to tell), American politics is a zero-sum game of percentages. IF you believe that the nation is very polarized, then even a few percent, especially in key states, will make all the difference.

Posted by Dean at May 13, 2004 07:42 AM

I think Nader is much closer to Pat Buchanan then you think. They are both pseudo-populist, anti-war, ultra-isolationist anti-Semites. I think the only point where they diverge is anti-communism, which in the post-Soviet era is pretty much a dead issue.

Posted by benjamin at May 14, 2004 03:32 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: