|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
"The Soft Bigotry Of Low Expectations" That's not the phrase that the president used tonight, but he could have, given that it's one that he's used effectively in other contexts. Overall, I grade him a "B" and better than expected. Worst moment: when asked why he and Cheney insisted on appearing together before the commission, he had no satisfactory answer. My politically-incorrect response: "Because this has shown itself to be a partisan witchhunt rather than an investigation into how 911 occurred, which was its stated charter. There is safety in numbers." But there's truly no good explanation for that. Best moment: when he chastised those who thought that Iraqis couldn't build a democracy because they had the wrong skin color. He went some distance toward explaining "why Iraq," but not sufficiently so to silence the critics, particularly since he can't tell the whole story for continuing diplomatic reasons. I don't know if this helps or harms in the short run, but in general it gives me confidence for the upcoming presidential debates this fall. Posted by Rand Simberg at April 13, 2004 08:17 PMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/2297 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Bush to Press: "You're Assuming That You Represent the Public. I Don't Accept That."
Excerpt: "In our system, the press has the role of..." Generations of journalists spoke confident sentences like that. The press is a vital check on power. It's quasi-Constitutional. Bush, head of government, rejects this idea. That theory has gone down, h... Weblog: PressThink Tracked: April 25, 2004 07:32 AM
Comments
I thought the worst moment was his fumbling the response to the question about mistakes since 9/11. For a brief moment I thought he was going to step up and take a strong "buck stops here" line, or even simply say something along the lines of "we all make mistakes, blah blah blah." As is he just fumbled around and then went off on a tangent. As to the 9/11 commission - I don't think the partisan label is going to stick very well. An independent inquiry was certainly called for (and was called for by conservatives as well as liberals), but the administration resisted. Had they taken the initiative the inquiry would be over by now. They've really blown it with the commission, first by stalling in creating it, then by pushing the executive privilege line (which helped engender hostility among otherwise neutral commissioners). The essence of the problem is that the commission is hostile, but it's not obviously partisan. I think that the commission's credibility is damaged badly by Gorelick's clear conflict of interest--she should be a witness, not a member--and ben Veniste's presence, since he's clearly a partisan hack. People who say that it's just his nature to act as a prosecutor seem to forget that he was one of Bill Clinton's biggest defense attornies during Whitewater and impeachment. There's also been altogether too much grandstanding on the part of Kerrey and others, both during the hearings and in separate press engagements. This is a show trial, not a serious investigation. Posted by Rand Simberg at April 14, 2004 10:22 AMBest moment: when he chastised those who thought that Iraqis couldn't build a democracy because they had the wrong skin color. A egregious strawman if ever I saw one. Highlights: The tie. Lowlights:
The worse you can say is that Bob Kerrey is an ass. The choice of Gorelick was a suprise, but then again - Executive Director Phillip Zelikow wrote a book with Condi Rice, and was heavily involved with the Bush transition. DC is a small town. Posted by Duncan Young at April 14, 2004 10:59 AMNo politician and few others answer the question "what mistakes did you make?" very well or at all. The President reflected on the question too long for some, but if you give the question serious consideration and have a conscience, that's likely to happen. The commission is obviously partisan - so what? The conservatives lobbed questions to Ms. Rice and the liberals did the same for Mr. Clarke. As for Bob Kerrey being an ass, it's clear that a person might be a war hero and an ass seamlessly. Posted by Cornell at April 14, 2004 09:16 PMThe President reflected on the question too long for some, but if you give the question serious consideration and have a conscience, that's likely to happen. He reflected on the question for a long time and came up with ...nothing. Not even a quip. Compare that to 01/04/04 Democratic primary debate... Bam bam bam, they were all able to use that question as an opportunity get their core MESSAGE across, and there were nearly outbreaks of wit. All were prepped to the eyeballs, of course. But by not preparing for his press conference, I was not honesty we saw last night - but contempt. To Iowa.. President Bush was not asked what mistakes he'd made in his life, but more specifically what happened in the days leading up to September 11 and what mistakes he'd made in that time. The reporters were looking for something specific. Who would not forgive a senator for an offense made early in his career? Or who said something false about a rival, but apologized? Et cetera. Yes, we can fault the President for not being practiced enough to say something as mind-numbingly banal as what his mother used to say about him or a quip, something snappy or hip. That this president is unlikely to do that is not something I would criticize him for. Posted by Cornell at April 15, 2004 07:07 AMCheck the transcript - the pause came after he was asked if he had made *any* mistakes *after* 9/11. Lots of opportunities. "I would have liked to have stopped the highway bill" "I could have been clearer on the FMA" - and leave it at that, winning the immediate support of both Sullivan and Musgrove. "I shouldn't wear radioactive ties" Posted by Duncan Young at April 15, 2004 08:23 AMBushwa. Posted by Cornell at April 15, 2004 11:58 AMPost a comment |