This probably isn't a new low for Gary Trudeau--I can't recall all of his previous outrages over the decades--but it's pretty bad.

Ah, well. I caught part of a Saturday Night Live bit last week with Clarke supposedly testifying. It was a serious put-down. Cheney had touched him in "inappropriate places." Why hadn’t he mentioned this before? He had to keep some material for his next book. He had had a "bad feeling" about Janet Jackson, and had wanted the White House to intervene before the show, but was ignored ... Very funny.

its pretty pathetic what people get outraged about these days. lying to start a war of choice for which there was no post war plan vs. a cartoon making fun of chimp in chiefs juvenile habit of giving people nicknames.

"...lying to start a war of choice" strikes me as pretty pathetic, "joe."

As your punishment for saying something so stupid, I'll leave this post up. It will serve to remind people of why the Dems and the left are so out of touch.

Ya know .. if you were to post the referrer log and IP info for the user 'Joe' it might be a lot more effective ... or would that be going beyond the pale?

Kerry's numbers go down, troll sightings go up.

You know, it's strange...
I used to like Doonesbury, I even have many of the original published collections of Trudeau's work.

But the last several years I've found myself more and more going "huh?" (or worse) when I read his work.

Is he getting loonier or am I getting more conservative? I have to say that I still find his early stuff funny. I enjoy reading the old strips in those old collections I own.

Somebody still reads Doonesbury? Why?

One vote for "he's a loon." And unfunny, too.

I quit reading Doonesbury in the early 80's when I realized just how unfunny and lame it was in comparison to 'Bloom County'.