|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
The Great Debate In a "Battle of the Bobs," Adam Keiper and the Ethics and Public Policy Center hosted a debate between Bob Park and Bob Zubrin. I didn't think that we'd hear much in the way of new perspectives or new arguments from either of them, and I was largely right, as one can see from the transcript. Clark Lindsey thinks that Dr. Zubrin had the upper hand (see February 7th entry), and I agree. Dr. Park remains firmly in the "science uber alles" camp, which is an unuseful position to take when trying to determine what the nation's space policy should be. Dr. Zubrin made several good points: Here's one that I've made before: I wonder what Dr. Park would have said if he had lived about 50,000 years ago in Kenya, along with the rest of the human race, which lived in Kenya at that time, and received a proposal from someone who thought maybe humans should colonize Europe or Asia. "Those places are impossible to live there. It?s much too cold." The -- you know, if they had robotic probes, "our robotic probes show you could not survive a single winter night in Europe." On Park's irrational robophilia: You mentioned Lewis and Clark. Okay, here we are, 200 years after Lewis and Clark. There is not a robot on this planet that you can send to the grocery store and pick up a bag of unbruised apples, let alone perform the Lewis and Clark expedition. So, if they can?t do a trip to the grocery store, how?s it going to explore a planet? And along the same lines, I loved this zinger at the end: ADAM KEIPER: The man who believes in sending robots to space, you can get his book via machines at Amazon.com for $15. Fifteen dollars, Voodoo Science, Amazon.com. So, that?s great.Posted by Rand Simberg at February 08, 2004 01:24 PM TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/2103 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
I think Bob Park hit the nail on the head. Humanity really is a cancer of the universe that must be prevented from contaminating the pristine astronomical wilderness at all costs. I just can't understand wackos like Zubrin who actually care what happens to human civilization in the future. I mean, who can seriously argue that they are worth more than an inanimate piece of machinery like Spirit or Opportunity? Posted by James at February 8, 2004 11:43 PMPROGRAM COST is the one key factor rarely mentioned by the pro-human space exploration side... Sure -- human geologists would be much more capable than Spirit, Opportunity or Lunokhod! But does it really matter, if we can get interesting data from several unmanned probes by spending "only" a few hundred million dollars? If Apollo is any indication, a manned program will be 10x - 100x as expensive. Robots become increasingly more cost effective the farther one ventures from Earth (what would the cost of a manned mission to Saturn/Titan be?). All the cheap sound bites regarding Lewis/Clark and robots capable of visiting the local grocery store totally neglect the consideration of cost. Which option is cheaper? As always, governments prefer to spend relatively modest sums on getting relatively modest results from robotic probes, rather than spending much more money on sending highly capable human explorers to the Moon or Mars. Space is a comparatively low priority with voters, which means the emphasis is on expendable unmanned spacecraft and launchers since they are less costly in the short term.
The space program is only worth its salt if it has goals. Sometimes these goals cannot be accomplished by robots, especially when the goals are stated explicitly as being "a human presence throughout the solar system". Robots can't do that. Ultimately, the point is that the space program will never be worth its cost if its only goal is science. The only payoff big enough for all of this effort is the human colonization of space, which will take some time to accomplish. Science is a "spin off". Posted by James at February 9, 2004 11:25 AMIf we, as humans, don't go, what is the #$#@&^% point of sending anything, robots or otherwise? And don't give me science. Science is a means not an objective. If we, as humans, don't go, what is the point of knowing? And don't tell me to lean how to better to live on earth. That's nuts. If we, as humans don't, go there is nothing out that that we can learn that will make one darn bit of difference to living here. Marcus said: Of course, and this is why all cargo, mail, and other deliveries are done by robots - robot trucks, ships, and aircraft are so much cheaper than the ones run by humans! And it is so much better to send robots to the office than ourselves! Much cheaper, much safer. Ahem. One should NOT go by what Apollo cost, since it is clearly possible to make space travel orders of magnitude cheaper than that. Reusable commercial spacecraft costs would be much more like airline costs. Robots are great for preliminary exploration (which was done on the Moon before Apollo) but humans are better for detailed followup exploration AND development (exploration is just ONE of MANY reasons to go to space). Unless, of course, we develop sentient robots, in which case, the whole issue gets a bit more complicated ... Post a comment |