|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
Spreading The Gospel Of Intelligence Gerhard Van der Leun has some thoughts about why we should go to Mars (which actually apply to leaving the planet in general). Posted by Rand Simberg at February 01, 2004 04:34 PMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/2088 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
We might be the only planet with life in the universe, but I tend to doubt it. We might also be the only planet that has ever had "intelligent life," but I tend to doubt this too. What I do wonder is if intelligence itself eventually tends to lead the species which posseses it into extinction if it acquires technology and science. As for ourselves, prosperity in the developed countries has resulted in populations which breed below their replacement rate. What happens when the entire world attains the levels of the advanced nations? Will we slowly go extinct? And what if we were a more aggressive species? Would we have killed ourselves off with nuclear wars? Don't get me wrong; I'm not some Luddite who wishes to get us all back to a state of nature, I'm just pondering a question. Technology gives power to transcend limitations, but from a biological perspective some limitations are needed to keep any given species alive. Could it be that whatever (if any) civilizations that existed before us on some far star(s) have been ultimately done in by their own advanced technolgy? Posted by tcobb at February 1, 2004 08:51 PMThe last sentence sums it up. Either we are alone or part of the crowd, either way, we gotta go! Debating religion is generally recognized as a waste of time and SETI et al. is certainly religion by any other name. But I swear that the Moon, Mars and the Asteroids look a lot to me, like the toys provided by a loving parent for the well being of us children. One day that might seem like a profound thought (with no drugs being harmed in the making of this generalization.) We continue now with your regularly scheduled work week. A very strange and unusual book called "Star of the Unborn" by Franz Wherful (sp?) is the story of the earth tens of thousands of years in the future where it was discovered that in fact we are alone. Much other weirdness in there though. Made my brain hurt. Posted by Jeff at February 2, 2004 07:56 AMunrelated, but tcobb Not to be a doom-sayer 'cause I'm not. I hope. I like to think I'm generally optimistic about the future. But a question the has crossed my mind from time to time "is intelligence actually the universal equivalent of cancer?" Something of like a self-correcting problem. With the inevitable result? Maybe that's why no one calls.
Where is everybody? A few possibilities: 1. Civilizations routinely develop large-scale antimatter production before leaving their home planets. Once that happens, a single deranged individuals can wipe out the species single-handedly. 2. Civilizations routinely stagnate and decline before becoming spacefaring. Thousands of human civilizations have followed that path, after all, and our own civilization might head the same way. 3. Dark matter is far more abundant than regular matter. If dark matter can be converted into regular matter and into energy, the spacefaring aliens will spread to where the dark matter is and pretty much ignore stars and solar systems. Posted by Ken at February 2, 2004 11:36 AMIve often pondered whether intelligence leads to civilization very often at all. Perhaps the most common property of intelligent life is desire to wipe out neighbors and destroy its own opportunities for evolution in the process. Perhaps humans have only gotten this far because of couple freak arms balances that have occured along the way. Posted by kert at February 2, 2004 01:11 PMI think there's actually a strong case to be made that intelligence is really self limiting. Progress is made primarily by those who are 2 sigma or more above the mean on any given measure of intelligence. You only get a limited number of Einsteins, Darwins, etc. The hallmark of civilization is that the contributions of the best are preserved and passed on. Any civilization will therefore gradually accumulate technical prowess up to and past the point where it is capable of total self annihilation. Now consider that there is no reason why political prowess need be intrinsically connected to intelligence in understanding the full consequences of one's actions - after all, power is gained by playing to those who are near the mean, not at the extremes. It seems reasonable to suppose that a significant proportion of civilizations will end up in a situation where they have the power to self-destruct (which is created by individual effort of the smartest) and lack the (collective) wisdom to avoid getting into situations where that power is used. Humanity itself came damn close a couple of times in the past century, and we are currently in a struggle with a foe who is more than willing to go down that path again, restrained only by a lack of resources. Over the next millennium or so it is likely that sooner or later someone will have both resources and desire. Be nice if there was a backup off world by the time that happens. Posted by Andrew Case at February 2, 2004 01:33 PMI think the reason we havent heard ET is because to them, Radio Frequency carrier wave technology is passe'. Remember, we have only possessed it oruselves for about one century. Even RF tech being state of the art for a couple of millenia would be a blip in the cosmic timescale. What is ET uses some form of quantum entanglement to exchange data over large spaces? Posted by Mike Puckett at February 2, 2004 02:00 PMThere are hundreds of ideas on the Fermi Paradox. It is great speculation, but we simply don't have enough information yet. In a debate, I could easily argue either side. For instance, there are hundreds of issues that would limit the number of worlds that could sustain earthlike life and have an environment stable long enough for a sentient species to develop and create a space faring civilization. On the other hand, it is dangerous to assume that life would have to be earthlike. And I could argue workarounds for most of the limiting issues. It is easy to forget that it has only been the last half century that we have been able to discuss realistic, though theoretical, ways to reach the stars. It has only been in the last decade we could observe planets in other solar systems. We still know almost nothing about the structure of any solar system other than our own. It's tempting to say that, because of the vast number of stars, there must be other technological species, but that's not science - you also have to make many assumptions about how life develops. Hopefully, future telescopes that can image earth sized planets in other systems will give us something to work with. My own guess, though I wouldn't try to defend it, is that there are other technological species, but there are very few of them. What kind of person goes hunting with bow and arrow? What kind of person rides horses or uses wind power for transportation? What kind of person does calligraphy or paints portraits? Sorry, but obsolete technologies are still used, often by otherwise weathly people as a hobby. And such people take their hobbies seriously. So someone ought to be complaining real soon about our stinking up the EM spectrum in the neightborhood. As for intellegent life being cancer-- isn't that the belief of the Greens and other misanthropic types? I prefer to think of intellegence as Gaia's reproductive organ, and right now it's trying to spread life to the rest of this solar system (and maybe beyond) with us as the medium. A vacuous essay--three dozen paragraphs with nothing more to say than three words. You gotta go? I think this author may appeal more to SETI types. Posted by Helen at February 2, 2004 07:14 PMKen - maybe dark matter IS Dyson spheres. ;-) Posted by covington at February 3, 2004 11:48 AMMabey he could have thrown in some made up numbers like Easterbrook does to make you happy Helen. Posted by Mike Puckett at February 3, 2004 12:18 PMPost a comment |