|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
Alternate Universe Robert Roy Britt has an interesting roundup of opinions about the future of human spaceflight, including some envisioning such a future without NASA, and some that yours truly has espoused once or twice in the past. William Hartmann remains firmly mired in the past, however. "This is naive and wrong-headed," says author and artist William K. Hartmann, also a senior scientist at the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Arizona. Newsflash, Dr. Hartmann. CEOs with short-term, self-serving accountant mentalities don't put their own personal fortunes into developing reusable tourist vehicles. This is exactly what has to happen to foster a global payoff for our grandchildren. The "give NASA billions of dollars and hope for the best" approach has been an unmitigated failure. Posted by Rand Simberg at December 09, 2003 09:09 AMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/1964 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
So Hartmann thinks international government cooperation will get us to the Moon or Mars. One would think a scientist would look to empirical observation of similar situations before speculating on the efficacy of a particular approach. After all, international governmental cooperation has brought been such an overwhelming success, especially in such well known tourist havens as Bosnia, Rwanda and Palestine. And the International Space Station is daily expanding the frontiers of human knowledge. Not to mention the astounding success of the U.N. Blahh... Posted by Man Mountain Molehill at December 9, 2003 11:42 AMAnother example of how people with scientific training think that their education qualifies them as experts in all the ~lessor~ fields like business and politics. Hartmann (and people like him) think that "international governmental cooperation is the best way to get [planetary scientists] to the Moon or Mars." But even in that they are wrong, having learned all the wrong lessons from Apollos 17 through 19. Posted by Raoul Ortega at December 9, 2003 01:19 PMI would reword Hartmann’s comment to read - Do we want to hand over this unique moment and all those resources to a bunch of regulated bureaucrats with their short-term, self-serving cover your butt mentality? Posted by Rocket Man Blog at December 9, 2003 02:13 PMWhat's sad is that most of the public will agree with Hartmann. Only NASA can or should do space with maybe the help of some its socialist buddies over seas! Posted by anonymous at December 9, 2003 03:48 PMYes, of course leadership groups that make decisions by comitte are far superior to the nimble and decisive leadership of a profit motivated individual. pfft... There is a political model that will work for space exploration that is also the most successful business model. Communism. And I'm not a communist. I think it sucks as a means to govern freedom loving people. But to get something done, which companies succeed? Those with centralized and unquestioned leadership. Not the fuzzy happy companies that are models of socialism, taking umpteen meetings and everyone's blith opinion into consideration. Certainly, there is room for inclusion, but it needs to be channelled into capitalistic competitiveness where do-or-die comes into play way sooner than lift-off. And not to be droll, but again - this is why space should be militarized. The military has the luxury of spending money we don't (and don't want to) see to get things done - and our military has demonstrated it's world superiority through the inventiveness of private miliatry contractors and industries. If not commercial, then military objectives are the next most sure bet. NASA, the ESA and every other procedure laden politically vulnerable organization is inevitably going to be mired in procedure and never get around to real space exploration. Either way, I'd be happier than what we have now, which is beurocratic bloat. But do I think China will beat us? Only if we keep giving them our secrets and letting them walk off with top-secret laptop hard drives. They don't have an original thought in their heads and until the open up their infrastructure to capitalism and the innovation it CAN provide, they'll be relegated to mimicking our successes. foo... there blows some steam. I feel better. Posted by Jerry Carter at December 10, 2003 06:59 AMI struck by how much this comment... "They don't have an original thought in their heads and until the open up their infrastructure to capitalism and the innovation it CAN provide, they'll be relegated to mimicking our successes." sounds like what was said about the Japanese auto industry. Posted by ken anthony at December 11, 2003 08:16 AMKen, I was referring to the Communist party in China... not Chinese in general - they're some brilliant people. Mr. Honda, among others, demonstrated my point (in reference to your comment on the Japanese Auto Industry). He started off as a machinist I think who started making motor bikes... and look at them now. That was a thoroughly capitalistic enterprise and he had plenty of competition along the way. And I shouldn't be so harsh. China IS becoming savy to the ways of the world, but the still retain a fringe of unoriginality (and again, 'they' refers to the PLA and it's political arm) and disingenous negotiation tactics. Espionage is an honorable method of research in Bejings eyes. Still, we have plenty of targets for blame. If Bill Clinton hadn't handed over our ballistic missle technology (this is a long and complex story which I summarize and dump on his head)... their space program would not be where it is today. Then again... if we hadn't been able to acquire the minds we did after WWII.... Posted by Jerry Carter at December 11, 2003 12:30 PMPost a comment |