Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« New Science Blogger On The Block | Main | Interesting New Legislation »

Rage Against The Night

Phil Bowermaster fisks an anti-anti-aging piece in SciAm.

Posted by Rand Simberg at October 09, 2003 09:38 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/1812

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

Thanks for the link. I'm proud to say that I'm anti-anti-anti-aging. It's just one of the things I happen to stand for.

Posted by Phil Bowermaster at October 9, 2003 10:26 AM

Oh God, it's going to be great watching the rich and powerful make themselves immortal at the expense of the rest of us. Those greedy, elitist pigs are the last ones who should be allowed to live forever. Read the novel "Ecotopia" for an idea of a better and less technological, less materialistic way to live.

Posted by at October 9, 2003 08:21 PM

Has anyone ever noticed that the most mindless, unsupported posts here, are anonymous? If I put up as stupid a commentary as that, I'd be embarassed to put my name to it, too.

Posted by Rand Simberg at October 9, 2003 09:15 PM

I'm not convinced by cryonics myself, but his remarks on the other stuff were well handled in the article. Telomere hacks may not be the only thing required, but we'll probably get something like it.

I am also pretty certain we'll start to see uploading experiments in the next few decades as the hardware gets ready.

I'm looking forward to it myself.

Posted by Dave at October 10, 2003 02:49 AM

Dave,

One can be far from convinced by cryonics without resorting to the tired arguments that Shermer introduces.

On uploading, would you allow a non-destructive scan that would create a virtual copy of you? How about a destructive scan that did the same thing?

Posted by Phil Bowermaster at October 10, 2003 09:58 AM

Phil,

Good question. I'll wait and see how the tech develops. To be honest, and of course, I wouldn't necessarily volenteer, I'd, in theory be prepared to accept a destructive scan - subject to having seen it work.

Of course, first I'll take the Telemere hack and what else we get over the next 4 or 5 decades.

My family have a good track record of making their 80's and 90's, so I'm prepared to live carefully and play a waiting game.

Posted by Dave at October 10, 2003 06:00 PM

Well, as someone signed up for cryonics, it comes down to 2 things:
A) Faith that a mature nanotechnology will be developed.
B) You're guaranteed dead if you don't (unless you live long enough to see it without freezing, which at 32, I'm sure as hell going to try to do). Like Dave, I've at least got longevity in the family. Hell, no one believes I'm 32. But if I into a fatal car wreck next week, I go into the freezer (just don't hit the head!).

Posted by Janessa Ravenwood at October 20, 2003 04:50 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: