![]() |
|
![]() |
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by ![]() Powered by Movable Type |
![]() |
![]() |
Lowering The Bar My latest piece at Tech Central Station is up, about how suborbital space transports may revolutionize space programs overseas as well, and its potential implications for national security. Posted by Rand Simberg at August 15, 2003 07:20 AMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/1606 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
The More Things Change
Excerpt: In his new Tech Central Station column, Rand Simberg sees a potential for moving on to the next stage from space exploration's long childhood: After decades, ruts as deep as this are hard to get out of, but we may... Weblog: The Speculist Tracked: August 16, 2003 08:47 AM
Comments
I've always wondered if UPS or other package delivery companies have expressed any intrest in suborbital transportation? It always seemed to me to be a logical evolution for their business. Posted by Matt at August 15, 2003 08:48 AMMatt - Why, exactly? What would the advantage be? Posted by Phil at August 15, 2003 02:19 PMThe speed in delivery is the only advantage I can see, assuming the suborbital could land at any runway and didn't cost too much per flight. Posted by ruprecht at August 15, 2003 04:25 PMI have heard FedEx has expressed interest in the concept. Posted by Mike Puckett at August 15, 2003 05:57 PMAnybody read "Friday" by R. H. Heinlein? Remember the semiballistics? Heavy G's at take off, a period of free fall, and a glide landing that can't be redone? (kinda like the current shuttle...once you start your approach, you're committed.) And they give point to point travel measured in hours rather than tens of hours. Posted by FDC at August 15, 2003 06:49 PMQuite a bit of late-40s/early-50s science fiction had an operating assumption that suborbital space transport was going to be a very profitable business. Look at Robert Heinlein's Rocket Ship Galileo for one example -- he posited an immense amount of suborbital traffic, but essentially nothing orbital... and the "first" lunar landing was done with a more-or-less homebuilt conversion of one of these suborbital rockets to nuclear power. His assumptions were pretty much what Rand is saying: mass-produced, heavily reused vehicles are fairly cheap, especially if they are single-stage. My guess is that RAH wasn't that wrong. Posted by Troy at August 15, 2003 06:51 PMI hear and read a lot about the space tourism aspect of sub orbital flight, but I hadn?t heard much about other businesses that might be interested in this technology. Reading the article about sub orbital flights got me thinking about who might be interested in fast transportation to almost any point in the world. I then remembered that in the early history of aviation, airmail delivery was the bread and butter of the early airlines. Because of the increased speed of delivery that could be obtained by using a sub orbital flight, I thought package delivery companies might be interested in the development of this type of technology. Instead of next day delivery, you could have same day delivery anywhere in the world. It also seemed to me that the requirements of reliability, fast turn around and cargo capacity that a freight company would require would help push the development of a sub orbital craft. I was wondering if anyone had any information about this? These are the questions I can think of off the top of my head. What currently existing companies might be interested in this? What cost per pound would be economical for this type of delivery? What other costs would have to be addressed? How many vehicles would be needed? Have any of the X-Prize contestants or the new start up rocket companies considered this as a business opportunity? Are reusable craft really needed? Or can expendable launchers be made at a low enough cost by using mass production? Is there really a market for this type of service? Or are the existing services already fast enough? Any thoughts or references would be appreciated. suborbital capable rockets won't cut it for package delivery. Past a distance of about 2,000 miles, the energy requirements are about the same for orbital and sub-orbital. suborbital capable rockets won't cut it for package delivery. Past a distance of about 2,000 miles, the energy requirements are about the same for orbital and sub-orbital. That's not necessarily a problem, since energy requirements aren't a particularly strong driver of launch costs. It might be a market that some of the early players aim for, and it will help gradually expand the performance envelope out to orbit. Posted by Rand Simberg at August 16, 2003 09:54 AMI think suborbital might be more efficient than super/hypersonic atmospheric transport as the majority of the flight profile is above the atmosphere an the demons aof noise and drag are minimized. Posted by Mike Puckett at August 16, 2003 05:03 PMPost a comment |
![]() |