Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Unfair And Unbalanced | Main | Barely Searching? »

Arnold Didn't Lie

He just changed his mind!

Seriously, this is one of my pet peeves--the conflation of the concepts of lying (make a statement one knows to be false about a present or past circumstance) and the breaking of a promise, or changing a position. They really are different things. I remember being particularly irritated during the impeachment saga when people said something like "So what if Clinton lied? Bush lied, too. He said he wouldn't raise taxes, and then he did."

Even leaving aside the fact that Clinton's lies were under oath, there is a distinction between making false statements, and taking a course of action different than that previously proposed, or even promised. Sometimes circumstances change, or new facts come to bear, in which case it's not reasonable to hold to a course just for the sake of being consistent with past statements. That doesn't mean that changes of position shouldn't be criticized--just that they shouldn't be considered "lies."

In the case at hand, of course, it does appear that Schwarzenneger was being untruthful before the show, but there's no way to know that for sure. It's at least conceivable (though not likely) that once he got up on stage, he decided at the last minute to go for it, so the headline, to me, is too strong.

Posted by Rand Simberg at August 12, 2003 08:19 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/1586

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

"Arnie lied, ratings died!"
"Arnie lied, ratings died!"

You can almost hear the protestors now!

Posted by Bob at August 12, 2003 08:29 AM

Much as I'm sure it comes as a surprise to "media" types, anything Arnie did or didn't say privately to Jay is none of their business; it's between Arnie and Jay.

I truely do fear for our future when I see what the clowns who gather and report the news think is (a) news and (b) important.

Posted by Barbara Skolaut at August 12, 2003 10:17 AM

Well, I disagree with you Rand. Bush elder lied. He said he wouldn't raise taxes, and then he did. You can talk about how circumstances changed, but that's a pathetic excuse for making such an outrageous statement in the first place. Despite that I wouldn't put him in the moral cellar with Clinton who commited perjury with his lies and got away with them.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at August 12, 2003 10:33 AM

Come to think of it, I bet Leno would like to get "lied" to more often. It can't help but boost ratings to have the occasional surprise announcement on his show. I'm slightly concerned that Scharwzenegger would make critical decisions without informing his advisors, but we have almost a couple of months to figure out if that's a real problem or not.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at August 12, 2003 10:41 AM

Karl, you completely miss my point. Breaking a promise is a bad thing, but it's not a "lie," unless he had no intention at the time of keeping it, something that we cannot know for sure.

The only things that can be called "lies" are statements about current or past events, not prospective ones. I'm not defending Bush--I'm just saying that he should be criticized for the right thing. Words mean things.

Posted by Rand Simberg at August 12, 2003 10:56 AM

The only things that can be called "lies" are statements about current or past events, not prospective ones. I'm not defending Bush--I'm just saying that he should be criticized for the right thing. Words mean things.

Ok, reaching for the wimpy Webster's collegiate dictionary, I see:

Lie: 1) A false statement purposely put forward as truth: FALSEHOOD, 2) Something meant to deceive or give the wrong impression.

Lies about future events can be said as well, but Rand, your point survives quite well. I can't prove that Bush purposely deceived the US public (or any other group), so using the term "lie" here is incorrect. Please accept my apologies.

Posted by Karl Hallowell at August 14, 2003 03:02 PM

Karl, read your own definitions and see if you want to retract. They contradict what you said.

Posted by David Perron at August 25, 2003 12:54 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: