Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« I Don't Care, I'm Still Not Going To Do It | Main | The End Of Man? »

Couldn't Happen To A More Deserving Fellow

Chirac's popularity is plummeting.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 03, 2003 08:43 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/1205

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

Interesting. What I find even more interesting is the observation that this is what Chirac's popularity was doing before the war. Makes you wonder how much of M. Chirac's posturing was to make himself look good for the voters, socking it to the arrogant Americans.

Posted by Jeff Dougherty at May 3, 2003 08:52 PM

I believe there was mention of that part of it at the time, actually.

Or was I thinking of Schroeder? Maybe both.

Posted by Kevin McGehee at May 4, 2003 07:10 AM

No comments about how "well" Blair did at the local elections last week? :-)

Posted by Dave at May 6, 2003 04:09 AM

I've never said that Labor wouldn't lose seats--just that Blair would retain the leadership, so it's hard to say how "well" he himself did. In fact, it may be that some of the losses were a result of his own party's opposition to "his" war.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 6, 2003 08:00 AM

Minor quibble, it's a proper name: Labour.

> In fact, it may be that some of the losses were a result of his own party's opposition to "his" war.

Highly unlikely, frankly. To be honest he's lucky the elections are May - another couple of months and even with inept Tories he could have easily lost another 200+ seats through domestic cock ups. I'll stand by my view that he'll have a rough time at the Party Conference.

There was an interesting review of the war in the Sunday Times where it pointed out a conference call between Rumsfeld and Peter Hoon - apparently Rumsfeld was shocked to be told that in the event of the vote going against Blair the entire cabinent were going to resign. It's moot now but it would have made an interesting historical footnote.

Posted by Dave at May 6, 2003 08:30 AM

Hey, we don't complain when you misspell our words...

I don't believe that the war will be a political factor at all. I assume you've noticed that support for it among the British public has skyrocketed since it started, and ended? It will probably increase further once we understand the disposition of the WMD.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 6, 2003 09:15 AM

I should add that it's not just French politicians who are suffering politically from opposition to the war. Mr. Galloway, who seems to have made himself Saddam's whore, has been suspended from the party, and may even be indicted for treason. I certainly wouldn't mind seeing him at the end of a gibbet.

I continue to be amused at the accusations of nefarious hidden agendas on the part of those who supported the war, when the reality appears to be exactly the opposite.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 6, 2003 09:20 AM

> It will probably increase further once we understand the disposition of the WMD.

Ah yes, I'd almost forgotten about them.

To be honest I've not really noticed much change in view of the war among the people I know. And yes, I do know what the polls say, its just that in my immediate and politically varied circle of friends and acquaintances there isn't much change.

I've always made the point that Blair banked on a quick win - which he got. But that the peace could turn into a nightmare, which it is showing all the signs of doing.

Posted by Dave at May 6, 2003 09:24 AM

> when the reality appears to be exactly the opposite.

Really? I hadn't noticed any real change. Channel 4 did an interesting piece on how many contracts for oil well reconstruction were awarded to "friends" of the Bush campaign more than 6 months ago, much to the disgust of the oil community in Texas who weren't even invited to bid.

Galloway was always a bit of a freak and it will be interesting to see how this pans out. I must admit that The Telegraph isn't necessarily the most reliable source of information, but I'd be happy to see him out of parliament. His reputation has always been murky.

As for the Gibet - the death penalty no longer applies for any crime in the UK.

Posted by Dave at May 6, 2003 09:29 AM

I didn't say I expect it--just that I wouldn't mind seeing it.

And there's plenty of evidence of it. Most of the Axis of Weasels seemed to be doing pretty well financially from Saddam's continued tenure, and a lot of embarrassing documents are being found that demonstrate this, which is, of course, exactly what they were trying to prevent. As far as I'm concerned, at this point, Chirac and co. have zero moral legitimacy, as does the UN.

Posted by Rand Simberg at May 6, 2003 09:38 AM

On the subject of the UN I'd personally rather see some evidence of all that equipment and weaponry that Powell told us about.

The stuff the official inspectors got laughed at for not finding because the Iraqi's were giving them the run around? That stuff.

It's easy for these things to get lost in the noise.

Posted by Dave at May 7, 2003 02:34 AM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: