Transterrestrial Musings  


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay

Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC)
Space Politics (Jeff Foust)
Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey)
NASA Watch
NASA Space Flight
Hobby Space
A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold)
Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore)
Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust)
Mars Blog
The Flame Trench (Florida Today)
Space Cynic
Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing)
COTS Watch (Michael Mealing)
Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington)
Selenian Boondocks
Tales of the Heliosphere
Out Of The Cradle
Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar)
True Anomaly
Kevin Parkin
The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster)
Spacecraft (Chris Hall)
Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher)
Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche)
Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer)
Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers)
Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement)
Spacearium
Saturn Follies
JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell)
Journoblogs
The Ombudsgod
Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett)
Joanne Jacobs


Site designed by


Powered by
Movable Type
Biting Commentary about Infinity, and Beyond!

« Just When You Thought It Was Safe To Go Back To TV | Main | And Then There Were Three »

Star Ship Troopers?

Nick Denton has some suggestions about our problem with space. I'm not as pessimistic as he is about the prospects for private enterprise, but I don't intrinsically object to his recommendation to increase the militarization of it. Every little bit that makes space more like just another place, and less like a blessed sanctuary for scientists, will help.

Posted by Rand Simberg at February 13, 2003 01:43 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/794

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments

The only problem with militarizing space is that generally speaking the military doesn?t share very well with others. They?re not going to want the rest of us up there cluttering up they?re fields of fire. Given the relative short window of time in which SDI has to identify, acquire a target lock and launch. They?re not going to be real happy with the idea of allot of private RLVs joy riding in they?re firing range.

Posted by Shawn at February 13, 2003 08:00 PM

The military doesn't seem to have problems sharing the seas with us. There are many military bases on American soil, and it doesn't impede us from doing what we wish. Why would space be different?

Posted by Rand Simberg at February 13, 2003 08:27 PM

Yes, civilian and military vessels do share the seas, but the civilian ships don?t rely on any recently developed military hardware. If the DoD develops and RLV you can be sure most of the critical systems will be classified. Just look at the trouble Boeing got into because of technology transfers to China. It?s not that the DoD won?t allow private RLV to enter space or could even stop them but their not going to openly share their technology or sell space available tickets on any of their launches. The benefits would be indirect. If the DoD built an RLV which was reliable an operated at a substantially lower cost than the shuttle (not hard) then civilian entrepreneurs could point to it in their business plans when they went looking for investors to them that it could be done.

Posted by Shawn at February 14, 2003 05:01 AM

There's no need to share their technology. Technology isn't the problem.

The problem is market, and the perception that it's not possible to build affordable space transports. If there's an existence proof of a low-cost vehicle created by the military, then it will become much easier for entrepreneurs to raise the money to build private ones, which is all that's really lacking.

Posted by Rand Simberg at February 14, 2003 08:41 AM

I could be wrong, but a spaceplane is going to look very different than a rocket on the military sensors, they are unlikely to be mistaken. Any rocket launches to supply stations should be registered ahead of time to avoid mistakes. Not a difficult task.

Posted by ruprecht at February 19, 2003 02:57 PM


Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments: