|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Space Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Hobby Space A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Mars Blog The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Space Cynic Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Out Of The Cradle Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) True Anomaly Kevin Parkin The Speculist (Phil Bowermaster) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Eternal Golden Braid (Fred Kiesche) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Redwood Dragon (Dave Trowbridge) Charles Murtaugh Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) Economics/Finance
Assymetrical Information (Jane Galt and Mindles H. Dreck) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) Journoblogs The Ombudsgod Cut On The Bias (Susanna Cornett) Joanne Jacobs The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Spleenville (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Site designed by Powered by Movable Type |
I Couldn't Care More Instantman points out that Norah Vincent has set up a blog. I checked it out. I hope she fixes this, because it's permanently part of the page, right at the top. I was disappointed. Ever wondered what was going on in the deep recesses of Norah's mind? Could care less? [pedantic rant] People, people, people (and Norah), the correct expression is "couldn't care less." Think about it. If you could care less, it means that you care. You are capable of caring less than you do. If you are trying to convey the notion that you don't care, you want to indicate that it's not possible to care less, not that it is. It's simple logic. Really. [/pendantic rant] Posted by Rand Simberg at August 19, 2002 11:07 AMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.transterrestrial.com/mt-diagnostics.cgi/233 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post from Transterrestrial Musings.
Comments
That always bugged me, too. And it's worse when people do it on the web, because you can't physically strike them. Posted by Mike at August 19, 2002 11:38 AMEither/or. Actually, they both make sense logically. You're right about "couldn't care less," but "could care less" also works, in addition to being more insulting. When you say "could care less" it implies that whatever it is that you are refering to is so utterly unimportant to you that you won't even take the time nor expend the energy to care less about it than you already do. Sure, you could care less, but why bother even determining that? You're saying that the thing you are(n't) caring about is so below you that caring less, or, better yet, establishing on a scale how much you care for it, is a total waste. Where as "couldn't care less" implies that you actually put in the effort to establish how much you care for it, which is less than eveything else. Simple logic. Really.
"When you say "could care less" it implies that whatever it is that you are refering to is so utterly unimportant to you that you won't even take the time nor expend the energy to care less about it than you already do." Huh? How can it require an expenditure of time or energy to reduce your level of caring about something? Sorry, it still makes no sense. Posted by Rand Simberg at August 19, 2002 05:13 PMIron Man -- you smoke the crack. Posted by Christopher "Spoons" Kanis at August 19, 2002 10:17 PMWell, whatever. I'm still saying "could care less." Posted by Iron Man at August 19, 2002 10:21 PMThis used to really bug me, too. Now, however, I could care less. I've always agreed with Rand's point of view on this one, however Iron Man's point is completely valid... 'How can it require an expenditure of time or energy to reduce your level of caring about something?' Logically you are correct, at some point the time and energy approaches zero; however, to state that you could or couldn't care less is something more than zero... which implies you care enough at least to comment. So, between something and nothing there must be more something... which is the energy you wouldn't spend (even though you've already spent more energy pointing out that you wouldn't spend less energy) Quite amusing when you think about it that way ;) "I couldn't care less about that" : you have reached the maximum amount of apathy possible. "Could you possibly care less?" said in an appropriately sarcastic tone of voice (mainly used by us women) implies that someone doesn't care but should. "I could care less" is the illegitimate love child of the two correct phrases and much more popular inspite of its illogicality. I think it's because people want to express that they dislike something instead of just being passive about it (not caring). The only time it doesn't bug me is when someone is saying they *would* care less about something if it wasn't for some other related thing that keeps bringing it up. In that instance I think they mean they "could care less" but you won't let them. That said, Norah didn't use any of them correctly. Posted by Cis at August 21, 2002 08:42 AMHey, the copy-editing masses have spoken ... and Norah has fixed it! Posted by The Mad Commenter at August 21, 2002 04:41 PMI noticed in the mid-eighties a very sudden change to the use of "I could care less" instead of "I couldn't care less". Because the latter expression has been used for centuries, the almost complete acceptance of the former in recent years has been a major source of irritation to me. For more than two decades now I have been pointing out to people the logical self-contradition of which Rand wrote. It's great to hear that there are still a number of people who understand the logic behind the original saying. Posted by Rick Boozer at August 23, 2002 09:56 AMOn a similar note, why do people say "Same difference," when they mean, "same thing"? Posted by Matt at August 23, 2002 09:17 PMFolks. I just accidently stopped by. The expression is 'I COULDN'T care less' That's the insult. ANY defense if 'I could care less' is simply nonsense. This IS NOT open for discussion. I'v been an English prof. for 41 years and am currently on the BOD for Websters. Of course, I realize, you couldn't care less'. Posted by Jim Rand at June 3, 2005 06:00 AMPS: Excuse the typing error on the above. Posted by Jim Rand at June 3, 2005 06:01 AMPost a comment |