I know that it’s only today, but the Carnival of Tomorrow is up anyway.
Intelligent Design By Voters
Yesterday was kind of depressing, from an electoral standpoint, particularly in California, but there was one bright spot, for those who value science education.
Lileks Is…
…nuts.
And I mean that in the best (and funniest, perhaps beyond genius) possible way.
How Much Closer To Hell Can He Get?
I mean, he’s already in Zimbabwe.
One Quote Says It All
Mary Mapes is still whining, this time to Howie Kurtz (who seems to be largely humoring her). But what tickled me was the bottom line:
Despite her career implosion, Mapes hopes to stay in journalism.
“It’s what I’m good at,” she said. “I like making a difference.”
“Making a difference,” ever since Woodward and Bernstein, has become the cliche reason for people to go into the profession of journalism. But judging by the results, “making a difference” seems to be more important than “improving the situation,” or understanding logic or reality.
More Sinofantasies
Mark Whittington manages to conflate both a strawman and a feverish delusion in a single post:
Allow me to present a scenario. The United States follows the suggestions of Jon, Rand, and others and stops the NASA return to the Moon.
This should have been “Allow me to present a strawman,” (Mark’s debate tactic of first resort).
Neither Jon, nor I (I can’t speak for Mark’s favorite bogeymen, those “others”) have suggested that NASA not return to the moon. We have merely pointed out that the means by which they’ve chosen to do so will result in tears, just as it did the last time.
For the delusion, one can go read the rest of the post. It’s hilarious.
I’m busy, so I’ll leave it to the wolves in my comments section to tear it to pieces.
Minor Disaster
I just got to the airport, and discovered that my driver’s license isn’t in my wallet.
I had to use a company badge for ID, and got a thorough screening in security, and have no idea how I’ll rent a car in LA. Unless Patricia can find it at home and overnight it to me, I may be without a car there. I’ve no idea where it is, though it may be on my nightstand, taken out of my pocket after my last trip.
What a way to start a trip.
[Update in the evening in LA]
Yup. I had taken it out of my shirt pocket, where it resided during my trip home the last time, and put it on my nightstand (where Patricia found it upon getting home from work), and then neglected to put it back in my wallet the next day. She’s Fedexing it to me, so I’ll have a car by Thursday. One useful definition of hell is being in LA sans auto.
The only reason that it was in my shirt pocket, instead of in my wallet, is that under the new idiotic security regime, one never knows when there will be a demand for papers, and it’s more convenient to pull the license out of a shirt pocket than to have to pull the wallet out and dig for it there.
And I don’t currently have a passport because it mysteriously disappeared on a trip shortly after September 11, when I got pulled out of line for a severe screening (for no obvious reason–I’d like to think that it’s because I look sort of swarthy and semitic, but that theory is blown out of the water by the fact that one of my co-screenees was a young blonde woman). I had the passport before the screening–when I got off the plane at the other end, it was gone.
Thanks a lot, Homeland Security!
On The Road Again
Heading back to California for another ten days or so. No posting until this evening, if then.
Why Should It Be?
Iran says it’s not afraid of the UN Security Council.:
“Iran cannot be intimidated by the Security Council. We do not take such threats seriously,” Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, told reporters.
Thanks, again, M. Chirac!
Math Is Hard
And not just for Barbie. This article says that math problems are getting too big for our brains.
Well, that’s one of the thing that transhumanism is for. This part bothers me, though:
Math has been the only sure form of knowledge since the ancient Greeks, 2,500 years ago.
You can’t prove the sun will rise tomorrow, but you can prove two plus two equals four, always and everywhere.
This begs the definition of the words “knowledge” and “prove.” Two plus two can be proven, I suppose (inductively from one plus one equals two), but only within the confines of the mathematics that you’re using. It’s not “sure” or “knowledge” in any absolute sense.
What they really mean is that some of the tougher mathematical problems are not amenable to classic deductive analytical proofs, but are more reliant on brute-force computations, possible now because we have machines that can perform them in a useful amount of time.