Can be found here.
It’s pretty long. How long did it take him to deliver it?
Can be found here.
It’s pretty long. How long did it take him to deliver it?
They lack a sense of irony:
The acrid scent of panic might have been expected among the limp-wristed, totalitarian faithful. And, in fact, beneath the amusing cologne of anti-Trump bluster, the panic was indeed discernible.
But there was also that trademark smooth-as-a-suppository (as Saul Bellow put it) suaveness, exemplified, for instance, by former Obama strategist David Axelrod.
“Robert F. Kennedy Sr.,” Axelrod posted shortly after the deed was done, “would have been appalled to see his son cut a deal to drop out for [t]he race and endorse Trump.”
Imagine: someone agrees to drop out of a race at the last minute and support a rival candidate! As the commentator Ned Ryan put it in response to Axelrod’s snippy post: “You suddenly seem offended by someone cutting a deal to drop out of the race and endorse someone else.”
…has been reassigned. A lot of speculation as to the reason and timing in this thread.
It’s kind of wild that the NASA official who is arguably most responsible for SpaceX getting a commercial crew contract a decade ago is getting pushed out at the same time Dragon saves the agency’s astronauts.https://t.co/IwPeRs1x8T
— Eric Berger (@SciGuySpace) August 24, 2024
It’s unclear to me whether he is being blamed for Starliner, or if this is Boeing’s revenge for the NASA decision to rescue with Crew Dragon. But if the latter, it would have been pressure coming from Boeing’s friends on the Hill.
[Sunday-morning update]
Will Boeing ever deliver on its contract?
With all the talk a decade ago about how SpaceX wouldn’t deliver and how prudent it was to give the lion’s share of the funds to Boeing, there should be plenty of crow to go around.
[Update a few minutes later]
Boeing was paid billions more than SpaceX to be seven years late on a mission it could not complete . . . And will now be rescued from total disaster by SpaceX
— Ashlee Vance (@ashleevance) August 25, 2024
Never forget, many bureaucrats wanted to sole source all of this to Boeing. pic.twitter.com/QEJ0ERuDq8
[Update late morning]
Some may be wondering what I think about the Starliner decision in the context of my book and our need to be willing to accept higher levels of risk. The point of the book was not that we should be reckless, but that the risk must match the reward.
— SafeNotAnOption (@SafeNotAnOption) August 25, 2024
There was no payoff in risking the astronaut's lives to come home in a flawed vehicle, other than to Boeing's pride (which would be an empty vessel by now if they had a smidgen of self awareness) and their bottom line.
— SafeNotAnOption (@SafeNotAnOption) August 25, 2024
The disconnect remains.
I would dispute the phrase “college educated” to describe the people who attended college and who support the Democrats. I’d call them, rather, indoctrinated and credentialed.
Creature of the oligarchy. It’s a depressing read.
Could it be coming to an end? I hope so.
Understanding the seven major errors of them.
Is it an auto-immune disease?
I think we’re going to discover that many diseases are auto-immune diseases, and that may be the key for dealing with them.
…relates an interesting experience in dealing with the government about which I am immensely unsurprised.
It’s nice to see Bill Clinton up there speaking and not some impeached, womanizing rapist. #DNC2024
— 🫃🏼💉🇺🇦🥥Hollaria Briden, Esq. (@HollyBriden) August 22, 2024