There’s total lunar eclipse tonight, visible from most of the US (assuming clear skies, of course) at a reasonable hour. Last one until 2007.

There’s total lunar eclipse tonight, visible from most of the US (assuming clear skies, of course) at a reasonable hour. Last one until 2007.

There’s total lunar eclipse tonight, visible from most of the US (assuming clear skies, of course) at a reasonable hour. Last one until 2007.

Jay Manifold offers his assessment of a potential SETI discovery.

Recent results from Cluster shed some light on the mechanism that brings particles from the solar wind into the Earth’s magnetosphere, creating the Aurora and radiation belts. The basic mechanism is vortices generated in the sheared flow region between the magnetosphere and the solar wind. The mechanism behind the vortices is called the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, and it’s fairly generic to low velocity sheared flows, as the discussed in the article.

The same mechanism will affect any craft powered by mini-magnetospheric plasma propulsion (M2P2), but the particle transport will be the other way – from inside the magnetic bubble to outside (since the inner particle density will be higher than the solar wind particle density, at least in the tail region). This will cause loss of ions from the bubble, and may turn out to be the limiting factor for M2P2.

There is a nice picture of Kelvin-Helmholtz waves in the Earth’s atmosphere here.

Hubble is starting to fail.

You know all those things you haven’t done in a blue moon? Well, get ready to do them again tonight.

The Great Wall of China, a river, whatever…it’s all good.

ESA doesn’t seem to know the difference.

Jay Manifold has a post about a mindless desecration in Pennsylvania, based on an email I forwarded him from Jim Oberg.

The April issue of Physics Today has a bunch of articles on planetary science, though only two are available without subscription. The Mars water article looks particularly good, and it’s one of the free ones.

Incidentally, in the letters section there’s a response to a naive letter about the roots of terrorism in a previous issue which hits the nail on the head.