Should Koskinen be impeached?
Yes. It’s really the only effective way to rein in executive tyranny. Even if the corrupt Democrats refuse to remove, as they did with Clinton, it’s still a useful method of discipline that is used far too seldom. And Gina McCarthy should get the treatment as well.
And Ben Shapiro applauds.
The only good thing about Trump as a candidate is that he’s not afraid to go after the media’s pet incompetent criminal.
He told me about this when I had lunch with him a few weeks ago when he was in LA, partly to deal with it.
Only twelve?
But her supporters won’t care; she’s a Democrat. Moreover, she’s a Clinton.
I love this: “How many people who are paying a company to host their data ask the company to stop backing it up? This is where the story gets good.”
[Update later afternoon]
At this point, what difference does it make?
Without the avalanche of distraction, hypocrisy, willful ignorance, and outright lies that the liberal elite and their human centipede press corps employed over the last few decades to ensure their corrupt, mouth-breathing, and/or perverted Democrat heroes are never held accountable, Trump would not be possible. We might still care about quaint things like character, competence, and not being a loathsome piece of human refuse.
But we don’t. Not anymore.
Hillary’s formulation of “Nothing matters, no one cares” is just a little different. For her, it’s “What difference, at this point, does it make?” You know, that comment she made when some congressmen – not including any Democrats – tried to hold her to account for getting four Americans killed and lying to not only their families’ faces but to our faces about it.
And the people who aren’t in Hillary’s trick bag are supposed to care that Trump’s a jerk?
They don’t, by and large. Sure, Trump makes what we conservatives all agree is a distasteful comment insinuating that a federal judge’s rulings would be governed by an inherited characteristic, in this case his ethnicity. The mainstream media goes nuts at how horrible Trump is for assuming that an inherited characteristic might govern someone’s actions in public office. Then a day later, the media experiences a collective climax over the fact that a woman has been nominated, and they think it’s great because that inherited characteristic will govern her actions in public office.
Read the whole thing.
Hillary sent emails “marked classified” from her server.
It doesn’t really matter, legally, whether or not they were marked, but her latest lie has been exposed.
My thoughts on why the FAA shouldn’t be regulating spaceflight.
She’s the candidate that the Democrats, the party of lies, criminality and corruption, deserve:
She enters the general election stage of the campaign as one of the most disliked and distrusted political figures in America, and one of the least popular presidential nominees of all time. Despite his even uglier public image and endless parade of divisiveness and insults, the Republican nominee-in-waiting only trails her by an average of two percentage points at this stage of the race, inside the margin of error. Several weeks ago, a Democratic operative basked in the afterglow of Donald Trump’s effective nomination victory, crowing on Fox News that the GOP had selected “exactly the candidate they deserve.” Ironically, both Trump’s strong backers and detractors on the right would likely agree with this statement, albeit for different reasons. This week, the same formulation applies to the Democrats. They’ve chosen the corrupt, opaque, power hungry, self-serving, aloof, greedy, politically soulless, congenital liar they so richly deserve.
In case it wasn’t sufficiently beaten into your psyche with a rhetorical two-by-four last night, Hillary Clinton has made history. Indeed. She has become the first presidential candidate of either gender to clinch a major party’s nomination while under active FBI investigation. That criminal probe — not a “security review” as she and her campaign have wrongly claimed — continues to produce serious new developments. Based on her deliberate, national security-endangering conduct, as well as a string of clues and actions by federal investigators, it is entirely possible that a recommendation for criminal prosecution will be handed down in the coming weeks. As America’s top diplomat, Mrs. Clinton ordered the implementation of an improper email scheme that predictably culminated in the compromising of thousands of classified documents, including top secret and ‘beyond top secret’ material. She ignored specific, personal warnings from State Department security officials about her reckless arrangement in 2009 and 2011, using her shockingly unsecure system throughout her four-year tenure as a means of thwarting public records requests and wielding total control over her correspondence. When the existence of her private server was revealed, Clinton and her attorneys unilaterally deleted tens of thousands of messages, falsely stating that none of them were work-related. She has verifiably and flagrantly lied about virtually every aspect of this scandal from the very beginning.
But other than that, she’s great.
The 90s and the Clintons were the last straw for me and Democrats.
[Thursday-morning update]
Hillary Clinton’s truth problem:
Reading through the interview transcripts and stories, I found nuggets buried deep in the coverage that offer a less flattering portrait of Clinton—that would suggest her presidency might lack transparency, candor, and accountability.
Gee, Ron, ya think?
Thoughts on empathy and lenient sentencing from Ken White (a defense attorney).
There is no amount of alcohol that I could drink that would result in my raping anyone, let alone an unconscious woman.
I agree with this: Clinton would be much worse than Trump, who doesn’t have any principles, whereas hers are terrible.
This is a bizarre story, to me, right out of the mid-90s. I didn’t know that NASA could grant an “exclusive license” for things that other people came up with, and I didn’t know that KST was still attempting to do tow launch.