…can’t shut Louis C. K. up, and they don’t like it.
I like it.
[Update a while later]
Louis C. K. still exists; women, libs hardest hit.
…can’t shut Louis C. K. up, and they don’t like it.
I like it.
[Update a while later]
Louis C. K. still exists; women, libs hardest hit.
Real and imagined.
No other institution has failed the public worse. Which is pretty sad, considering the competition.
[Update mid afternoon]
The media lied, people died. And this was driven purely by Trump derangement. If he said something might be useful, it couldn’t possibly be.
[Update a few minutes later]
Great. It may be that the virus can spread through normal breathing. I don’t know; seems like it would be spreading much faster if that was the case. But we continue to suffer from a lack of data.
How the pandemic will change our views of them.
We really are living in the Crazy Years. Children are no longer allowed any period of innocence.
“If I get the coronavirus, will I be fine?”
…urge government to reopen schools quickly, before students learn to think for themselves.
[Update a couple minutes later]
Under the circumstances, though I have in the past, I’m not doing an April 1st post this year, but the Bee steps up to the plate.
[Update Thursday afternoon]
We are all homeschoolers now.
This is going to have a huge impact on education, and for the better.
…though the people who have performed these studies come at the question from different directions with differing social and political attitudes and with differing methodologies, there is very little difference in their conclusions. They all find that recent graduates seem to have been very poorly educated. One study after another has found that they write badly, can’t reason, can’t read any reasonably complex material, have alarming gaps in their knowledge of the history and institutions of the society in which they live, and are in general poorly prepared for the workplace.
The most interesting—and devastating—of these studies is that by Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa, whose book documenting their study, Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, appeared in 2011. Arum and Roksa found that higher education in America today “is characterized by limited or no learning for a large proportion of students.” More specifically, “An astounding proportion of students are progressing through higher education today without measurable gains in general skills as assessed by the CLA [Collegiate Learning Assessment].” The authors also find “at least some evidence that college students improved their critical thinking skills much more in the past than they do today.”
Looking at a sample of more than 2,300 students, Arum and Roksa observed “no statistically significant gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing skills for at least 45 percent of the students” tracked in their study. What is interesting here is that the two researchers seem somewhat puzzled by these results. Nonetheless, they see clearly enough that the blame must rest with the faculty—that students didn’t just get dumber for no reason. Arum and Roksa think the problem must be that professors don’t demand enough of students. In one sense they are right (though not in the way they probably intend), but they seem unwilling to ask why this change has happened. It can’t be that faculty suddenly became lazy.
Like the public-education system, this is a self-imposed and costly national disaster. Most of these people aren’t educated; they’re merely credentialed, and the credentials are in many cases worthless.
[Late-morning update]
Here’s an example of the problem.
[Update a couple minutes later]
No, U of California, you cannot ban the phrase “Chinese Virus.”