James Capretta and Yuval Levin say it must be stopped.
Category Archives: Business
The Socialist Federation
Commercial Friendly?
Taylor Dinerman says that NASA is finally moving in the right direction. We’ll see. Particularly after the Augustine review.
The Story That Doesn’t Fit The Narrative
The media doesn’t want to talk about Fannie and Freddie:
Do you know how much we’ve committed to backstopping Fannie and its partner-in-crime Freddie Mac (FRE)? $400 BILLION! Back in February that was doubled from the original $200 billion.
But the news of the quarterly loss is getting hardly any attention. Nothing here at the NYT business section, for example. Nothing at the blogs that were going nuts when AIG was revealed to have paid out bonuses back in March.
The problem is that the Fannie and Freddie disasters don’t fit into any conventional media narrative. At AIG you had Joe Cassano, lurking in the shadows, turning AIGFP into his own personal casino, while taking home gargantuan pay.
Fannie Mae? They help nice families get into homes. Their motto is something about helping the people who help house America. Who could be against that? Plus, the Fannie and Freddy story doesn’t help explain the idea that laissez-faire deregulation is what allowed Wall Street to go crazy. Fannie and Freddy had their own freakin’ regulator, OFHEO. Two companies with one regulator to look into both of them.
And then you have all the Democrats on the inside (Rahm Emanuel, for example) on the outside (Barney Frank), who have ties to the company’s worst years.
Yes, inconvenient, that.
Ethanol Versus Electricity
An interesting discussion of the transportation tradeoffs of biofuels.
A Good Question
From Iain Murray:
The news has just broken that the Federal Reserve is requiring GMAC to raise $13 billion in new funding. Given the way its previous creditors were treated, just who do they think will lend to them?
Gosh, it’s almost as though they want to take over the economy.
Virgin Vision
Will Whitehorn talks a good game:
He foresees uses of the spaceship for science experiments, for example as an alternative to visiting the International Space Station or using unmanned flights for pharmaceuticals companies seeking to use microgravity to change particles.
Later, the aircraft could be used to launch small satellites or take other payloads into space, Whitehorn says. “We could put all of our server farms in space quite easily…”
…Eventually, he sees the possibility of transporting passengers to terrestrial destinations in spacecraft outside the atmosphere instead of by plane. He says a journey from Britain to Australia could be done in about 2-1/2 hours.
“That’s a 20-year horizon,” he said.
I’d take that a lot more seriously if he had liquid engines…
And of course, he never misses an opportunity to bad-mouth the competition:
Virgin is not the only non-governmental party trying to develop space travel in the private sphere, but Whitehorn is confident it will be the first to take passengers into space.
SpaceX, led by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Elon Musk, is developing space-launch vehicles but they are not designed to carry passengers.
Well, yes, if you ignore the Dragon…
And of course, XCOR might beat them, though if they don’t get to a hundred klicks, the claim will be that they’re not in space, despite the stars, curvature of the earth, and minutes of weightlessness.
Obama’s Policies More Bankrupt Than Chrysler
Obama’s grand design for U.S. automakers is the perfect opportunity to show where his moderate rhetoric varies from his big-government actions. He has said he doesn’t want the government to be a permanent owner of big companies, arguing — in part correctly — that he inherited the bailouts and partial nationalizations from the Bush administration. But Obama’s plans for Chrysler and General Motors belie his claims that he doesn’t want the government to dig in further. His actions show that he isn’t shy about using the powers he inherited to favor political allies such as Big Labor at the expense of millions of Americans with savings vehicles invested in auto company debt securities.
The government-union ownership structure — in which the United Auto Workers retiree health care fund would own 55 percent, Fiat would own 20 percent, the U.S. government would own 8 percent, and even the Canadian government would own 2 percent (Canada is “home to several to several large Chrysler facilities,” according to the Wall Street Journal,) — also has little to do with repaying taxpayers.
As a Wall Street Journal editorial just before the bankruptcy announcement put it: “Taxpayer-shareholders are likely to be far better off with a smaller stake in a truly private company that is better insulated from political meddling. Private owners are more likely than the Treasury or the unions to try to run the company for profit, and so increase its equity value over time.”
But that wouldn’t accomplish the political goals.
Socialism
In the videos, YAF members approach their classmates with a petition calling for the redistribution of student GPAs. “It would make it so that all students have an equal opportunity to go to grad school,” University of Oregon YAFer Kenny Crabtree explains. Students with bad grades would therefore be entitled to points earned by straight-A students.
Their classmates are flabbergasted.
“Is that, like, a joke or something?” one guy responds.
“Why would you take points from people who are higher up and give them to people who didn’t meet the requirements?” another asks George Mason University YAFers. But when asked if he supports Obama’s wealth redistribution schemes, he says “yes.”
Shocking? Not really. As I pointed out in my March 30 column, most college students are economically illiterate. When quizzed by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute about basic concepts, such as supply and demand, the average student’s score was 53 percent. And since most don’t work or pay taxes (only 46 percent of full-time students have jobs), they simply have no idea how capitalism works.
The economic illiteracy being promulgated by our educational system is quite depressing. It’s almost like it’s part of a grand scheme.
They Voted For The One
They wanted change. They got it:
Not surprisingly, companies’ take on the issue is that the proposals, if passed, would raise their cost of operations and put them at a disadvantage when competing against overseas rivals based in countries with lower corporate tax rates, according to SiliconValley.com. Silicon Valley companies will be among those lobbying against the proposals. Said Carl Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group:
On a Richter scale of 1 to 10, this is about a 20.
So ye sow, so shall ye reap.
We’ll see what this does to his approval ratings in Silicon Valley.