All posts by Rand Simberg

Now Here’s A Real Find

An actual pan of LOTR appears at Ross Anthony’s (whoever he is) web site.

It’s definitely an epic undertaking, long with intermittent brazen fight scenes, sort of an “Apocalypse Now Junior.” Unfortunately, and unlike Scorsese’s masterpiece, the most profound thing about LOTR is its length. I had to use the restroom at the two-hour mark, and frankly enjoyed the break. Nor does LOTR deliver a payoff to its patient audiences.

Apparently he has a short attention span, or a weak bladder or both. Of course, his credibility is not enhanced by the fact that it was not Scorcese, but Francis Ford Coppola who directed “Apocalypse Now.”

I still want to see it.

[Update]

Somebody apparently fed him a clue–he’s since done a s/Scorsese’s/Coppola’s/ at the site…

Now Here’s A Real Find

An actual pan of LOTR appears at Ross Anthony’s (whoever he is) web site.

It’s definitely an epic undertaking, long with intermittent brazen fight scenes, sort of an “Apocalypse Now Junior.” Unfortunately, and unlike Scorsese’s masterpiece, the most profound thing about LOTR is its length. I had to use the restroom at the two-hour mark, and frankly enjoyed the break. Nor does LOTR deliver a payoff to its patient audiences.

Apparently he has a short attention span, or a weak bladder or both. Of course, his credibility is not enhanced by the fact that it was not Scorcese, but Francis Ford Coppola who directed “Apocalypse Now.”

I still want to see it.

[Update]

Somebody apparently fed him a clue–he’s since done a s/Scorsese’s/Coppola’s/ at the site…

Real ‘Murricans

In the midst of a discussion about Jonah Goldberg’s kvetch about his booze being slandered by the war reporting, the Instapundit mistakenly notes:

Good thing I’m a bourbon drinker. Like all real Americans. . . .

Well, I normally respect Professor Reynolds’ opinions but, while I hate to differ with that [RANT=”fuming”] closet commie bedwetter from Tennessee, as a proud (temporarily) Caribbean blogger, I wish to forthrightly state that rum was this nation’s first likker, and it remains the only true beverage for real real Americans.[/RANT]

Real ‘Murricans

In the midst of a discussion about Jonah Goldberg’s kvetch about his booze being slandered by the war reporting, the Instapundit mistakenly notes:

Good thing I’m a bourbon drinker. Like all real Americans. . . .

Well, I normally respect Professor Reynolds’ opinions but, while I hate to differ with that [RANT=”fuming”] closet commie bedwetter from Tennessee, as a proud (temporarily) Caribbean blogger, I wish to forthrightly state that rum was this nation’s first likker, and it remains the only true beverage for real real Americans.[/RANT]

Real ‘Murricans

In the midst of a discussion about Jonah Goldberg’s kvetch about his booze being slandered by the war reporting, the Instapundit mistakenly notes:

Good thing I’m a bourbon drinker. Like all real Americans. . . .

Well, I normally respect Professor Reynolds’ opinions but, while I hate to differ with that [RANT=”fuming”] closet commie bedwetter from Tennessee, as a proud (temporarily) Caribbean blogger, I wish to forthrightly state that rum was this nation’s first likker, and it remains the only true beverage for real real Americans.[/RANT]

New York Political Fantasy

In response to my comments about the prospects for changing the political complexion of New York state, New York reader Charlie Banks opines:

As a New Yorker who has been fighting a losing battle against the cult of Clinton in my lifelong home state, I must say I see a glimmer of hope in the political wakeup call New York may have heard post-9/11. Schumer, I must admit, comported himself quite elegantly in the immediate aftermath (tho’ unfortunately he’s clearly reverted to form, judging from his Fed-Orgy op-ed in the NYT), but on the other hand I’ve noticed the general consensus that just about the only major New York State political figure whose approval numbers have not risen since 9/11 is Hillary Clinton. If the political hay to be made from these attacks doesn’t help her, nothing will.

I’ve always had something of a political fantasy going in the last year or so, which goes something like this:

(1) George Pataki runs for a third term as Governor in 2002, and wins;

(2a) Rudy Giuliani is appointed to a high-profile federal post related to homeland security, OR

(2b) he runs for New York Attorney General in 2002 alongside Pataki, and wins;

(3) Gov. Pataki declines to run for a fourth term in 2006, and instead declares his candidacy to unseat Senator Clinton;

(4) Possible-A.G. Giuliani runs to succeed Pataki as Governor in 2006.

In my estimation, (1) is looking more likely every day. Element (2a) looks like something Bush would just love, and is probably more likely than (2b), at least at this late date. The fate of (3) hinges on how Pataki does in his presumptive third term, but if his popularity continues to outshine Clinton’s as it does now (and has consistently for years), I’d put money on him. Giuliani doesn’t even need the A.G.’s office to pull off (4), but then, that is a long way off.

To crib another New York catch-phrase (Yankee fan tho’ I am), Ya Gotta Believe.

Yes. Well, much can happen in five years. Heck, as we’ve seen, a lot can happen in three months. This looks like as reasonable a scenario as any right now.

Of course, it’s hard for me to feel a lot of sympathy for your senatorial plight–where I spend much of my time, I have to contend with Boxer and Feinstein. The only hope that I see for California is some kind of partition–I’d move to northern California (the part way above San Francisco) in a minute if it were removed from the bootheel of Sacramento.

Osama bin Rubin

With regard to the JDL bomb plot, I haven’t seen any metacomments about how this plays into our PR strategy. After all, if the White House had scripted this themselves, it couldn’t be better–a Jewish extremist group plots to blow up a mosque, and are arrested before they can bring their evil scheme to fruition. How better to prove that the war on terrorism is not a war on Islam?

Has anyone seen this story reported in any of the Arab media (it doesn’t really fit the template, does it)? I’ll be waiting for someone to point out some sightings. Email’s to the left, or put it in the comment box below.

I suspect that while I wait, I’ll have time to not only brew a cup of coffee, but to grow the beans…

Pretty In Pink

Curious Aghan tourists were shocked at the opulence in which the Mullah “Cyclops” Omar lived, according to this article from the San Francisco Chronicle.

A series of bedrooms — at one end Omar’s, a smallish room adjoined by a pink-tiled bathroom, a soft-mattressed bed and a neat row of clothes cupboards that filled the only room untouched by the rain of bombs — straggled down a hallway littered with glass and broken cement. A Western kitchen, including a Whirlpool dishwasher, was in one corner of the sprawling two-level house.

“Obviously, he shouldn’t have led this luxury life,” said one man who was touring the house. “He should have lived a simple life.”

Another man interrupted. “What they said was that he was living a simple life and preaching Islam,” he said. “But in reality he was living like this.” The man waved the barrel of his rifle around a second-floor patio, a look of dismay on his lined face.

“He was supposed to be a religious man,” explained Said Abdullah, a young man who said he had lived in Pakistan for most of his life, but wanted to come to Kandahar now that the war seemed over. “I have memorized all 6,666 lines of the Holy Koran, and I think I know what it means to be a good Muslim. But I am not sure Mullah Omar was a good Muslim. Look how he lived here. Look at what he did to our country. Did the Taliban do anything for all the poor people of our country? No, I don’t think so.”

No, I don’t think so either.

But wait–I thought it was only evil western colonialism and capitalism that allowed the ruling classes to live in decadent luxury while the poor starved. How can we explain this?

Chomsky? Sontag? Bueller? Bueller?

Anyone?

Will this story be covered on Al Jazeera?

X-33 Finally Bites The…Dust

According to Space.com, Lockmart’s bid to keep the carcass of the X-33 intact has failed.

Sensibly, it was decided that the whole was less than the sum of its parts, and have correspondingly distributed them among several other Space Launch Initiative programs. My opinion is that the value remains overstated, but at least now we don’t have to worry about the program being resurrected with Air Force money, as was being threatened a few months ago. It’s time to put this sad chapter in mismanagement behind us, and to move forward into an era of true commercial space transportation.