|
Reader's Favorites
Media Casualties Mount Administration Split On Europe Invasion Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire Congress Concerned About Diversion From War On Japan Pot, Kettle On Line Two... Allies Seize Paris The Natural Gore Book Sales Tank, Supporters Claim Unfair Tactics Satan Files Lack Of Defamation Suit Why This Blog Bores People With Space Stuff A New Beginning My Hit Parade
Instapundit (Glenn Reynolds) Tim Blair James Lileks Screeds James Lileks Bleats Virginia Postrel Kausfiles Winds Of Change (Joe Katzman) Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson) Samizdata Eject Eject Eject (Bill Whittle) Pajamas Media Space
Alan Boyle (MSNBC) Space Politics (Jeff Foust) Space Transport News (Clark Lindsey) NASA Watch NASA Space Flight Personal Spaceflight (Jeff Foust) Rockets And Such Hyperbola (Rob Coppinger) Hobby Space Dispatches From The Final Frontier (Michael Belfiore) The Flame Trench (Florida Today) Orlando Sentinel Mars Blog Space Cynic Curmudgeon's Corner (Mark Whittington) Selenian Boondocks Tales of the Heliosphere Spaceports (Jack Kennedy) Out Of The Cradle Robot Guy (Ed Minchau) Parabolic Arc Space For Commerce (Brian Dunbar) Space Revolution (Ferris Valyn) A Babe In The Universe (L. Riofrio) Space Pragmatism (Dan Schrimpsher) Carried Away (Dan Schmelzer) True Anomaly Space Law Probe (Jesse Londin) Planetary Society (Emily Lakdawalla) Space Solar Power (Colonel Michael "Coyote" Smith) Back Off Government Chair Force Engineer (Air Force Procurement) Space, What Now (Tom Hill) Life At The Frontier (Joe Gillin) Troubadour (Brian Swiderski) Space Prizes Spacearium Saturn Follies JesusPhreaks (Scott Bell) Futurism/Transhumanism
The Speculist (Group) Future Pundit (Randall Parker) Next Big Future (Brian Wang) Fight Aging Science
Nanobot (Howard Lovy) Lagniappe (Derek Lowe) Geek Press (Paul Hsieh) Gene Expression Carl Zimmer Turned Up To Eleven (Paul Orwin) Cowlix (Wes Cowley) Economics/Finance
Asymmetrical Information (Megan McArdle) Marginal Revolution (Tyler Cowen et al) Man Without Qualities (Robert Musil) Knowledge Problem (Lynne Kiesling) The Funny Pages
Cox & Forkum Day By Day Iowahawk Happy Fun Pundit Jim Treacher IMAO The Onion Amish Tech Support (Lawrence Simon) Scrapple Face (Scott Ott) Regular Reading
Quasipundit (Adragna & Vehrs) England's Sword (Iain Murray) Daily Pundit (Bill Quick) Pejman Pundit Daimnation! (Damian Penny) Aspara Girl Flit Z+ Blog (Andrew Zolli) Matt Welch Ken Layne The Kolkata Libertarian Midwest Conservative Journal Protein Wisdom (Jeff Goldstein et al) Dean's World (Dean Esmay) Yippee-Ki-Yay (Kevin McGehee) Vodka Pundit Richard Bennett Victory Soap (Andrea Harris) Random Jottings (John Weidner) Natalie Solent On the Third Hand (Kathy Kinsley, Bellicose Woman) Patrick Ruffini Inappropriate Response (Moira Breen) Jerry Pournelle Other Worthy Weblogs
Ain't No Bad Dude (Brian Linse) Airstrip One A libertarian reads the papers Andrew Olmsted Anna Franco Review Ben Kepple's Daily Rant Bjorn Staerk Bitter Girl Catallaxy Files Dawson.com Dodgeblog Dropscan (Shiloh Bucher) End the War on Freedom Fevered Rants Fredrik Norman Heretical Ideas Ideas etc Insolvent Republic of Blogistan James Reuben Haney Libertarian Rant Matthew Edgar Mind over what matters Muslimpundit Page Fault Interrupt Photodude Privacy Digest Quare Rantburg Recovering Liberal Sand In The Gears(Anthony Woodlief) Sgt. Stryker The Blogs of War The Fly Bottle The Illuminated Donkey Unqualified Offerings What she really thinks Where HipHop & Libertarianism Meet Zem : blog Space Policy Links
Space Future The Space Review The Space Show Space Frontier Foundation Space Policy Digest BBS AWOL
USS Clueless (Steven Den Beste) Media Minder Unremitting Verse (Will Warren) World View (Brink Lindsay) The Last Page More Than Zero (Andrew Hofer) Pathetic Earthlings (Andrew Lloyd) Spaceship Summer (Derek Lyons) The New Space Age (Rob Wilson) Rocketman (Mark Oakley) Mazoo Rocket Forge (Michael Mealing) COTS Watch (Michael Mealing) Spacecraft (Chris Hall) Kevin Parkin Laughing Wolf (C. Blake Powers) Quark Soup (Dave Appell) A Voyage To Arcturus (Jay Manifold) Site designed by Powered by Movable Type 4.0 |
More Thoughts On DestinationsFrom Henry Spencer: In its early years, the only form of manned space exploration it favoured was an (international) Mars expedition. All other ideas that involved humans in space were counterproductive and undesirable, to hear the Planetary Society tell it. Unfortunately, we don't seem to have the societal patience necessary to do the unexciting parts, at least if the government is paying for it. Which is why we have to get private industry going ASAP. [Early afternoon update] I mentioned yesterday that Paul Spudis wasn't impressed with Lou Friedman's thoughts. He's similarly unimpressed with The Planetary Society's new roadmap. [Another update a few minutes later] Jeff Plescia has been leaving this message in comments at various places (I've seen it at NASA Watch and Space Politics] As a participant in the workshop sponsored by the Planetary Society at Stanford University in February, 2008, I feel obliged to make some comments with respect to what is said in portions of the Planetary Society document "Beyond the Moon A New Roadmap for Human Space Exploration." For what it's worth. Thanks, Lou. Maybe it's like the climate change "consensus," from which many scientists are now running. 0 TrackBacksListed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: More Thoughts On Destinations. TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.transterrestrial.com/admin/mt-tb.cgi/10729 11 CommentsLeave a comment
Note: The comment system is functional, but timing out when returning a response page. If you have submitted a comment, DON'T RESUBMIT IT IF/WHEN IT HANGS UP AND GIVES YOU A "500" PAGE. Simply click your browser "Back" button to the post page, and then refresh to see your comment.
|
Rand wrote:
Unfortunately, we don't seem to have the societal patience necessary to do the unexciting parts, at least if the government is paying for it. Which is why we have to get private industry going ASAP.
I agree with you 100% on this, Rand. Just judging from our most recent election and political climate, there is no way that a project of this size and undertaking would be feasible if run by the government. There just isn't the political will/structure to take on a multi-presidential (not to mention Congressional) government in DC.
As far as private industry, what do you think there is to gain for a company to take on an effort such as 'Mission to Mars' (or even mission to the moon)?
s far as private industry, what do you think there is to gain for a company to take on an effort such as 'Mission to Mars' (or even mission to the moon)?
Profit, by taking money from the people who actually want to, and are willing to pay, to go.
As far as private industry, what do you think there is to gain for a company to take on an effort such as 'Mission to Mars' (or even mission to the moon)?
You should ask Elon Musk. SpaceX was founded because of his association with Bob Zubrin and their joint desire to go to Mars.
In fact, it was Elon (and Frank Sietzen, who was then SpaceX's Washington representative) who met with Sean O'Keefe and persuaded him that NASA ought to replace the Shuttle with expendable rockets and capsules so they could go to the Moon, Mars, and Beyond.
Elon undoubtedly (and naively) expected that SpaceX would get the contract to build those capsules and rockets. (They were already working on the Dragon design at the time.) COTS was not what Elon was after, it was just a consolation prize NASA threw at him.
Elon undoubtedly (and naively) expected that SpaceX would get the contract to build those capsules and rockets. (They were already working on the Dragon design at the time.) COTS was not what Elon was after, it was just a consolation prize NASA threw at him.
I'd be very surprised, if he thought he had a chance at them. Even assuming most of the Falcon 1 launches were successful, that's a big jump from the Falcon 1 to a manned Falcon 9.
Well I personally am glad we don't have the patience acting through our government to execute something as extensive and strenuous as colonizing another planet. Golly, if we were that good at marching in rank behind our leaders, what else would we be doing, down here on Earth? One shudders to contemplate it.
Let us not wish fascist means for a desirable end -- the means have a way of breaking loose from their original ends and running amok. Just ask Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn about their fascinating little observation that uranium atoms occasionally split in half, releasing lots of energy, which could be put to constructive use if harnessed.
Well I personally am glad we don't have the patience acting through our government to execute something as extensive and strenuous as colonizing another planet.
I agree, Carl, but that's not really the point. I would like to see the government at least have the foresight to put policies in place that would make it more likely to happen, using the resources of those who want to make it so. Throwing up roadblocks such as the Outer Space Treaty, and implementing space policy that makes it seem impossible isn't useful.
That was, after all, the idea of the Founders--to put into place a system that would allow a young country to grow, without demanding that the government make it happen by picking the pockets of taxpayers.
This is actually a good theme for an essay, or at least a column...
Well, write it, Rand, damn it. I sure can't, and somebody's got to try to reach that fraction of Obama voters -- kind of a 'special needs' group, if you know what I mean -- who are capable of learning.
Arguably these are more critical times for spaceflight than the 50s or 60s. Right now there are people wanting to make a private go of it, and so far the government is mostly not paying a lot of attention -- which is perhaps the best for which we can hope, over the long run.
But that could very easily change. There's all kinds of ways government, the big clumsy beast, could trample on the green shoot, from applying the clammy claw of regulation to sucking up all the oxygen on which private venture must thrive. It's not that it won't come back, sooner or later, but it might not be in time for any of us now living to see it. That would be sad.
Duty calls you!
The problem is the government has already picked the tax payers pocket. All they're doing now is arguing how to spend it.
I 2nd Carl's motion. Ok, this blog isn't a democracy. The fact is you can make the case better than most anyone I know. That's the problem with the 9th amendment. We shouldn't need our rights specified in writing (being unenumerable.) But even when they are in writing and clear the government abuses them.
The idea that they can regulate the space industry away is certainly scary. I think Elon is too far along for that to be his major worry, but it could keep others from following. Bigelow has mentioned the difficulties he's had for the stupidest things.
I notice that the SpaceX manifest includes an F9 maiden flight this quarter. Does anyone have better info?
Found it myself... June 2009 is planned maiden flight of the f9. Six months or so behind their initial schedule. Not too bad all things considered if it holds up.
Via Slasdot.org:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=red-planet-alert-massive
Glaciers on Mars? I'm surprised that Rand hasn't commented on this, yet.