I guess this explains why the Big Bopper was so enamored of "a wiggle in her walk."
anon wrote:
The synopsis states that 16 women participated in the study. Only 16 women? How can these scientists expect to see trends with that populace? Try 1,600 or perhaps 160,000 participants.
On the other hand, this likely shows the ease with which one can become a licensed "sexologist". Just think of the interesting and important papers one could write.
Josh Reiter wrote:
"Only 16 women?"
Oh, I'm sure they had thousands, these were the 16 that caught their eye.
Leave a comment
Note: The comment system is functional, but timing out when returning a response page. If you have submitted a comment, DON'T RESUBMIT IT IF/WHEN IT HANGS UP AND GIVES YOU A "500" PAGE. Simply click your browser "Back" button to the post page, and then refresh to see your comment.
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Rand Simberg published on September 5, 2008 11:25 AM.
I guess this explains why the Big Bopper was so enamored of "a wiggle in her walk."
The synopsis states that 16 women participated in the study. Only 16 women? How can these scientists expect to see trends with that populace? Try 1,600 or perhaps 160,000 participants.
Only 16 women?
Exactly.
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/book.htm#Sorry
On the other hand, this likely shows the ease with which one can become a licensed "sexologist". Just think of the interesting and important papers one could write.
"Only 16 women?"
Oh, I'm sure they had thousands, these were the 16 that caught their eye.