Various factions of the DoD are fighting over it.
This is great, considering that a few years ago none of them wanted anything to do with it.
Various factions of the DoD are fighting over it.
This is great, considering that a few years ago none of them wanted anything to do with it.
What will it do next?
Why did West Point remove them from its mission statement?
Rick Tumlinson thinks it needs more vision. I agree.
You won’t believe what they want Israel to do rather than take Rafah (and wipe out Hamas).
Defining the battle ahead of us.
She is one of the great women of our age.
…lies through the Rafah offensive.
The military strategy for Hamas’ October 7 attack was to create the largest scale of atrocity possible and survive Israel’s counterattack. Then, having survived, it intended to build up for many more October 7 attacks, all with the aim of achieving its grand strategic goal: the destruction of Israel and the death of the Jewish people.
Ghazi Hamad, a senior Hamas political leader, stated as much, saying, “Israel is a country that has no place on our land. We must remove that country … the Al-Aqsa Flood is just the first time, and there will be a second, third, and fourth. Will we pay a price? Yes, and we are ready to pay it.”
Hamas’s hope is that repeated attacks like October 7 will eventually break the will of the Israeli population. To do that, Hamas would need to survive the war.
The solution is simple, then. Don’t allow them to survive the war.
The trouble with defining it.
…is central to Hamas’s sadistic wars.
“There’s almost no body they were satisfied with (just) shooting.”
Simply gruesome. And the people marching in protest to support it are the vilest of the vile.
Stephen Clark runs it down.
We really need bases in ELEO to deal with threats like this.