…is a damp squib.
I wasn’t as impressed with the original as I was supposed to be, partly because of its anti-capitalism theme.
…is a damp squib.
I wasn’t as impressed with the original as I was supposed to be, partly because of its anti-capitalism theme.
Comments are closed.
I hope it bombs in historical fashion.
Avaish-tar, Way underwater?
Fie and fum. I rarely read movie reviews. Critics are almost all bitter and mediocre people who never even tried to make anything of their own. They know their only chance to be noticed is to be contrarians.
A film that aims low should not praised for hitting that target
– Gene Siskel
A picture of Ebert and Croce
I saw Avatar only because it happened to be on TV. I did not have high expectations. I had not read reviews but had seen South Park’s parody, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dances_with_Smurfs
South Park was right, yet I enjoyed the movie and will watch the sequel.
Never saw the original and don’t miss the fact that I haven’t. Probably for the same reason I’m not a gamer.
I watched the original once. It was basically “Dances With Wolves…In Space!” I have no interest in watching the sequel. Maybe it’s a problem with my testosterone level.
It was basically “Dances With Wolves…In Space
Yuck. Do any of them eat hard boiled eggs out of a jar in zero-g?
Or a dumbed down version of Dune (unobtanium – spice).
How is it that 22nd-Century humans can travel all the way to Alpha Centauri in spaceships… but they still haven’t developed glass strong enough to withstand a wooden arrow?
It’s been around for a while. It’s called bullet-resistant polycarbonate or acrylic.
Heh, Avatar was anti- nothing less than the entirety of Western Civilization.
It ironic that one of the most commercially successful capitalists in the world, constantly reworks the old socialist themes into new productions, then sells them to the present and upcoming tribe of socalists. Who then go on to convince others that it’s a work of transcendence that you simply can’t miss. More power to him.