…is snake oil, not science.
I find few things more annoying than morons who couldn’t integrate a function or even solve a quadratic equation to save their lives telling me that if I disagree with them on climate, or anything, that I am “denying science.”
5 thoughts on ““Social Distancing””
Comments are closed.
I’m dropping the term. We are not practicing social distancing. We are practicing socialism. The various local governments have enacted total control over the means of production. We don’t like it, and until we learn to like it, they are going to continue to have us “practice”.
The good news is that Wisconsin retained a Republican seat and California flipped the throuple seat back to Republican. Voters aren’t interested in staying socialist.
“Given the acute sample, testing was holistic.”
Er, what?
They tested all the people that met their specific criteria.
[“Given the acute sample, testing was holistic.”
Er, what?]
Given that the closed and controllable nature of the test subjects (a naval vessel) gave them the ability to test virtually all subjects as symptoms became apparent, they were able to test for the presence of the virus they were looking for. I think. Might also mean they were able to test everybody and directly compare positives AND negatives to the existence of the virus.
Yes Rand , but do the communication Major(s) (Kelly at a minimal) you been linking to on this subject, are they capable of Bi-nominal multiplication? Or know what this cargo cultish greek letter σ means in statistics/probability theory?
Those who call social distancing “Pseudo science“, should have the same credibility as those who would call the Laffer Curve “pseudo economics”.
Now you want to argue the effectiveness at a certain point (Tax rate/Distance) sure have at it.
Now the real safe distance is probably closer to this..