The media covered up JFK’s predatory sexual behavior and other things, like his mafia ties, while he was in office. Looks like, toward the end of his final term, they’ve doing the same thing with Barack Obama. As Glenn often says, if you want a media that will be a watchdog, instead of a lapdog over the White House, elect a Republican.
47 thoughts on “Our Raunchy President”
Comments are closed.
It will get no mention on the nightly news shows. It’s the jackhammer of constant repetition in the major media that makes a scandal. Otherwise, no traction, no scandal.
I am sure Jim thinks that this isn’t newsworthy and therefore was something that should be kept secret.
And the new emails show that the Clinton campaign is made up of Christophobes that are trying to destroy Christians. And we learn from one of the victims that the IRS audited people on behalf of this effort.
Will we hear about how the Clinton campaign hates all Christians?
Will the media be upset Bill was using racist slurs directed at white people?
These rules have to apply to the people that made the rules.
New meme: From now on they aren’t reporters, they’re slanderers.
There’s a reason for privacy. If somebody is actually assaulting woman, that’s a crime. If they’re thinking and talking about it, they’re an entertainer in Vegas.
“These rules have to apply to the people that made the rules.”
But you can’t run an effective Soviet State that way. /sarc
I watched the video on this page:
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/10/12/cnn-sitting-on-obama-erection-video-since-2008/2/
I saw a guy talking on the phone, but I didn’t see any erection and I didn’t see any sexual behavior.
More video
Yes Leland, in the video, the future president is reading from his _book_ ! Here’s the text from the book:
One of the guys sitting nearby must have overheard us because he leaned over with a sagacious expression on his face.
“You guys talking about Malcolm? Malcolm tells it like it is. No doubt about it.”
“Yeah,” another guy said. “But I’ll tell you what. You won’t moving to no African jungle anytime soon. Or some goddamn desert somewhere sitting on a carpet. With a bunch of Arabs. No sir. You won’t stop me eating no ribs, either. Gotta have them ribs. And pussy too. Don’t Malcolm talk about no pussy. Now you know that ain’t gonna work.”
I noticed Ray laughing and looked at him sternly.
“What are you laughing at?” I said to him. “You never even read Malcolm. You don’t even know what he says.”
Now, you can debate the literary merits of Obama’s work, but it is literature, and this makes Obama an author, not a sex predator.
More video
Time to get a new prescription. It’s really not subtle or easy to miss.
Snopes agrees with me:
http://www.snopes.com/presidential-erection/
It’s kind of amusing that you imagine that we would take Snopes seriously. Even Wikileaks is more reliable on political matters.
I think you meant Wikipedia?
But this isn’t a political matter. As long as everyone is willing to be honest about what they see, it is a perceptual matter, At best, this is like that dress that some people thought was blue and other people thought was gold. I’m well aware that you often disagree with Snopes, but I think that the editors of Snopes would report honestly on what they see.
Well, that’s where you and I disagree. They only report honestly when it suits their political dispositions. Then they report otherwise.
It’s kind of amusing that you imagine that we would take Snopes seriously
Epistemic closure FTW.
No, they just retreat into the weasel word “unproven”.
Well, of course it’s proven. It’s right there in the video. Why else would the female reporter be hurrying away like she’s got a lemon in her mouth? Why else would he be thrusting his pelvis and hiking his leg so?
I put it down as harmless horseplay, myself. And, judging by the peels of laughter, they’re all enjoying it. There’s no harm, no violation, no coercion. But, it does highlight the cynicism and the shocked, shocked! affectation by the Dems.
I mean, it’s surreal. We have the wife of a certain rapist running on their ticket, whose had to pay out 100’s of thousands of $$$ to his victims, and everyone’s putting on like they’re getting the vapors because Donald Trump said women throw themselves at him, and he could engage in wanton behavior with them if he wanted to. What a sad, sad commentary on our country that people are so willing to let themselves be manipulated so easily.
getting the vapors because Donald Trump said women throw themselves at him
No, Trump said he puts his hands and mouth on women without waiting to see if they’re interested, and at last count a dozen or so different women have come forward to confirm his statement.
If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ ll find.
Trump said he puts his hands and mouth on women without waiting to see if they’re interested
Do you have something to back up that claim? It’s certainly not from the leaked video where he said “women let you” in regards to “celebrities”. Perhaps you have something other than your imagination to support this latest notion of yours, Jim?
Do you have something to back up that claim?
Here’s what Trump said:
He’s so sure that women will let him kiss and grab that he kisses and grabs without waiting. The possibility that they might not consent is dismissed out of hand. That’s a textbook description of sexual assault.
An idle boast is not sexual assault. This is sexual assault. And, your support of his enabler for President is the height of hypocrisy.
And, this is rape, corroborated by the nurse who tended to her. Your hypocrisy has reached stratospheric heights. You should be ashamed of yourself.
“And when you’re a star, they let you do it.”
Apparently when you’re a President they let you stick cigars in their vagina. Did Bill Clinton say he assaulted Monica Lewinski? Do you, Jim, think Bill Clinton assaulted Monica Lewinski?
Fact is, the women supposedly being discussed in the video claims that Trump was entirely professional with her. So are you calling that lady a liar, Jim? Your claiming Trump admitted to sexually assaulting someone that claims no assault occurred? Is that the argument you want to continue to make? If so, I ask again, do you have anything to back up the statement you are making?
The statement doesn’t show unwillingness on the part of the women as you are claiming.
And no, kissing isn’t textbook sexual assault.
An example of Snopes lying.
Its blasphemy to question the party clergy.
Maybe Jim and Bob-1 are homophobes and can’t see it.
You be crazy.
Why are the Democrat women squeeing like little girls and shouting not to block the view? Never seen a guy talk on the phone before?
And then you say it isn’t a political matter…
Dude, c’mon.
“Never seen a guy talk on the phone before?”
You could ask the same question about the press and the photographers in any presidential campaign. They have a pretty boring job, listening to the same stump speeches at mind numbingly similar campaign events, taking photos of the candidate at one podium after another. If a candidate comes to the back of the plane to hang out with the press, they take photos.
Well, I assume you guys are being earnest here, so I’ll just shrug in bewilderment, and agree to disagree.
Bob-1 as usual you ignore the salient point:
Answer why the girls were squealing and why one of them looked embarassed. Not horrified-embarrassed just embarrassed.
Maybe she was embarrassed because some of her fellow women were acting like they were at a Justin Bieber concert.
Well, of course, I don’t know. And neither do you — none of us were there. But I’ll discuss it so that you don’t think I’m dodging your questions.
Unlike Bart (see his comment above), I think that almost airplane passenger, reporter or secret service agent, male or female, in that situation, upon noticing a presidential candidate with an erection, would be embarrassed.
Unlike Bart, I don’t think it would be perceived as horseplay. I don’t know if it would be perceived as sexual aggression or just inappropriate – that probably depends on the beholder – but I’m sure a plane full of professional reporters would not hoot with enjoyment over such a display. And that includes female reporters who thought the president is a pretty good looking fellow and/or those who were sexually attracted to him, at least at some level. My experience with women suggests to me that such women would also be embarrassed, in that situation. Your milage might vary, but you asked me what I think.
So, my question would not be why one of them looked embarrassed; my question would be why all of them didn’t sound embarrassed?!
My answer: they thought he looked interesting wearing jeans.
Why was the one woman embarrassed? Maybe she started to speak to Obama and then realized he was on the phone. (I occasionally inadvertently interrupt my wife while she is on the phone, and it can be embarrassing, depending on what I say to her and depending on who she is talking to on the phone.) But really, I have no idea. I just commented because the video was described as Obama with an erection, which seemed bizarre, and when I watched the video, I saw no such thing.
Gregg, I hope I gave you a complete answer.
Two more things, not directed at Gregg:
1, note that this video has been out since 2008, so the premise that it was hidden until now is a mistaken one.
2, the idea that I’m also Jim is really pretty funny, and quite flattering. I have a very different writing style and thought process than Jim. Anyway, if Rand looked at his site’s logs (but why would he bother?) he could confirm that either I’m not Jim, or I’m going to quite a lot of work to make it look like I’m not him.
“…but I’m sure a plane full of professional reporters would not hoot with enjoyment over such a display. “
It’s amazing to me how many babes-in-the-woods have self-identified over this faux scandal. Good lord. Either that, or they are disgustingly cynical, and playing dumb to score points.
The Press and Obama are chums, dude. This is they way people who are intimate with one another behave.
“…they thought he looked interesting wearing jeans.”
OMG. You are making me tear up.
“This is they way people who are intimate with one another behave.”
Only people who are *very* intimate, at least in my experience. If you live the kind of lifestyle where a crowd of women hoot and squeal at their male friends’ erections, at work no less, I’m not going to judge you, but I don’t think many Americans live that way.
Do you really think otherwise?
“Only people who are *very* intimate, at least in my experience.”
That about describes the relationship between Obama and the Press. I mean, come on. Open your eyes.
Maybe she was embarrassed because some of her fellow women were acting like they were at a Justin Bieber concert.
Why?
full of professional reporters would not hoot with enjoyment over such a display
Ya, we all know how “professional” these Democrat propagandists are. They aren’t some pious and unquestionable group of people. They aren’t clergy. They are corrupt human beings as we have seen by their actions through the Obama and Bush administrations and now with their collusion with the Hillary campaign.
My experience with women suggests to me that such women would also be embarrassed
My experience with women is that they are horndogs just like men and also joke around crudely about sex. This is especially true with leftist women who think crude sexual attitudes are empowerment.
Maybe we should ask some Chippendales dancers how women are?
And that includes female reporters who thought the president is a pretty good looking fellow and/or those who were sexually attracted to him
Except that women often swoon for the rich, powerful, or attractive.
This ties into the Democratic Logic Tree, aka the Underpants Gnome approach to debate that they nearly-always use.
The crucial part of the cheerleading isn’t the bias of the actual reporting in the story. While that may be outrageous, and there might be bald-faced lies based on what the definition of “is” is… The pernicious part is the choice of stories themselves.
Fox gets a lot of flack for having obvious partisans, and for just that they’re considered conservative hacks. But in Al-ville, a conservative hack media would have its main office in Chicago (or Detroit, or anywhere with persistent insanity. Seattle? SF?) and report on inner-city problems incessantly. Make the national story local for just one city.
The media is a disgrace. The public is catching on to this fact.
It’s all about getting their crook in the WH and nothing more. Any moral outrage is pure fiction.
Hillary claiming to take the high ground is the biggest load of crap of it all.
The good news, after Trump wins in a landslide partly because the media will continue to overplay their hand, is that it flushes out the republicans that need to be replaced.
Bob-1 has been tagged by Jim, and is carrying the Democrat water!
Has anyone ever seen them together in the same room? Hmmmmmmm.
Probably in a sock drawer.
Y’all remember Mitt Romney? You remember the morally reprehensible thing he did? To his family dog?
Resourceful son of the president of an automobile company that he is, he strapped a dog carrier to the top of the family station wagon, complete with a motorcycle windshield to the dog could look out the front.
Mr. Romney’s sons seated in the “way back” of the station wagon had noticed the disgusting substance emanating from the dog that was coating the back windshield. No problemo! Mitt being the type of take-charge leader as well as family man that he is, pulled the car into the nearest self-service car wash to hose off the dog as well as wash down the roof and back of the car.
Do you remember all of the outrage over this? Were that he bragged about groping a woman he was not married to rather than shamefully mistreating a dog that way!
Computer, enhance.
Here’s a photo taken during the video (at about the 18 second mark in the clip embedded in the PJ media article Bob-1 linked at the top): http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/democratic-presidential-hopeful-sen-barack-obama-talks-on-his-cell-picture-id81020883
It looks to me like he’s just got something in his pocket, but I suppose that this is one of those cases where people see what they’re looking for. I’ve seen more convincing photos supposedly proving that Michelle Obama is a man.
Forgetting for the moment the erection part…..
if any Conservative places his leg like that in front of women it would be declared manspreading and therefore mysoginist. From Wiki (since that seems to be the acceptable font of knowledge:
“Sitting more expansively may signal dominance and sexual attractiveness for males. ”
LibDemSoccie women would be shrieking on the streets in mass protest if they saw a Republican or a Conservative do that.
Given the look on that one women’s face and the apparent bulge, I’d say the accusation is likely true.
Just love the locker room gals straining and screaming for people to get out of the way so they could see more.
But since the Double Standard is in vogue with the media, this will get a good leaving alone by the MSM
Warning Will Robinson! Warning.
Bob says, “this isn’t a political matter.”
If Wikileaks teaches us anything it’s that to the left…
1) Everything is political (nothing but about power.)
2) They network into everything (corrupting even our best institutions with targeting of weak people in power.)
3) They use their opponents money (which the idiots give them even when they think they aren’t… see name game.)
4) Style beats substance (non stop beating people for the wrong words, but completely deflecting evil actions.)
0) They lie. They fallback lie. They lie about lying. If nobody objects they repeat the first lie which has been conclusively proven to be a lie. They create false fact checks to lie about the lie being proven. They send in Jim.
The people are on to them.
It’s long past due I return the Cable-TV box. Go buy an Internet box and stop sponsoring the malignancy…