Nixon had eighteen minutes. Hillary has five months.
But I’m sure she discussed nothing in those five months except wedding planning and yoga classes.
[Update late morning]
Now-classified emails are sitting on Google and AOL servers.
It’s almost as though the federal government is massively incompetent.
Well don’t forget the requests for staff to bring her iced tea.
The gaps:
Jan. 21 – March 17, 2009 (Received Messages)
Jan. 21 – April 12, 2009 (Sent Messages)
Dec. 30, 2012 – Feb. 1, 2013 (Sent Messages)
I.e. there are no emails to or from Clinton’s account for her first two months on the job, or emails from her account for her last month. I’m not sure how you can describe that as a five-month gap, unless you’re combining gaps, and counting sending and receiving separately.
Did you even bother to read the article?
First sentence:
”
DailyCaller
Home
2016
Politics
US
Entertainment
Sports
Business
Tech
Education
Opinion
Outdoors
Energy
Blogs
The Mirror
Matt Lewis
DC Trawler
Send a Tip
Hillary Clinton speaks to supporters in Columbus, Ohio, Sept. 10, 2015. (Youtube) Hillary Clinton speaks to supporters in Columbus, Ohio, Sept. 10, 2015. (Youtube)
Daily Caller News Foundation
Hillary Clinton Emails Have A FIVE-Month Gap
Photo of Ethan Barton
Ethan Barton
10:34 AM 09/14/2015
1104
208
Five months worth of messages are missing….”
As in not suggesting 5 months contiguous…..
Then Fitton did use a confusing phrase…..
““A five month email gap,” ”
But then also was quoted right after as saying:
“Some of the gaps were as long as a month or more, Fitton said. ”
In other words, no on is saying 5 contiguous months.
and you would have known that had you bothered to read the article before shooting your mouth off.
As in not suggesting 5 months contiguous…..
Adding up discontiguous gaps is ridiculous. There’s a gap of some duration between every consecutive pair of emails in the timeline. If you added them all up they’d total four years, the entire period Clinton was Secretary of State. So why not say that there’s 4 years of gaps in the email record?
Not to mention that Judicial Watch is counting some months twice, once for sent messages and once for received messages.
A neutral story would go something like: Internal State Department emails reveal that the cache of email messages turned over by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did not include any messages sent from her private account during her first two months or final month in office.
“Adding up discontiguous gaps is ridiculous. ”
1. Yes but that’s NOT what you said..is it?
no you put words in people’s mouths and then attacked the unspoken words. Just like your idol.
2. Oh so 18.5 minutes was bad but 5 non-contiguous MONTHS total worth of emails from the SoS is “ridiculous”?
What is ridiculous is your weasely hopeless attempts to pretend this is not a serious problem.
Fitton called it a five month gap. Rand called it a five month gap. I didn’t put those words in their mouths.
What is ridiculous is claiming what Rove did was anywhere near the same thing. No one is asking for Hillary’s DNC emails.
She’s toast, and she’s likely to be sanctioned.
Yah, instead of noticing the missing emails, Jim focuses on the time span.
Did you know Nixon’s 18 minute gap was 18 1/2 minutes???!!!! We should just ignore the missing time because we were 30 seconds off!!!
Or, in other words, you once again put words into people’s mouths and then apply a flamethrower to what was *NOT* said.
I guess you never tire of being a fool.
Even the article from Judicial Watch is clear:
“(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released newly obtained Department of State documents showing a nearly five-month total gap in the emails former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton decided to return to the State Department late last year. ”
“….5 month TOTAL gap…” [ Caps are mine]
Not contiguous.
(stuffs cheeks with cottage cheese from cafeteria line)
Food . . . fight!
Meanwhile, certain demographics are starting to notice and respond:
This from the WashPo – not exactly a Right Wing paper:
“The numbers in a new Washington Post-ABC News poll are an alarm siren: Where 71 percent of Democratic-leaning female voters said in July that they expected to vote for Clinton, only 42 percent do now, a drop of 29 percentage points in eight weeks. ”
The article says the decline is steepest among white women.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/poll-sharp-erosion-in-clinton-support-among-democratic-women/2015/09/14/6406e2a0-58c3-11e5-b8c9-944725fcd3b9_story.html
No emails while preparing for the Benghazi hearing. I guess she thought it wasn’t important to get information to provide to Congress and the American people. She would make a horrible President.