…is a setup. Whenever the unelite and uneducated, but credentialed government class tells us that it’s time for a “national conversation,” they mean “shut up and listen to us.”
4 thoughts on “The “National Conversation” We’re Supposed To Have”
Comments are closed.
Why am I strangely reminded, when Democratic politicans propose a “national conversation,” of when a narcissist girlfriend says it’s time to “talk about our relationship?”
Maybe it’s the identical instinctual urge to cover the nuts.
Here’s Ace of Spades’ take on the “national conversation”:
Sarah Palin Speaks On Tucson Murders; And The Loughner Left Has Gone Full “Conscience [sic] Dreaming”
Read the whole thing. And don’t miss Ben’s comment at #56.
Ace is absolutely on fire today. He must have a dozen different threads up.
And don’t forget: it’s got to be a “civil” national conversation.
The Left’s definition of “civil:” “The serfs saying ‘Please’ and ‘Thank you–may I have another?’ when we bugger them.”
I don’t see why we can’t just continue the conversation we were having from 2000 to 2008 about how the president is a fascist and shredding the Constitution. It was good enough for them at the time.