Henry Vanderbilt has the latest:
HR.5781 is not on the House calendar for this week. Our sources tell us that at least in part due to a significant number of constituent calls late last week, the House Leadership probably (no guarantees, of course) won’t put HR.5781 on the calendar this session (at least not in its current form). We hear that negotiations with Senate Authorizers continue, with the outcome (if any) now more likely to be based on the Senate bill. So, the battle is going well — to everyone who made a contact so far, thanks! But the battle over this NASA Authorization continues. We need to keep the pressure on, with the general message being, NASA Exploration R&D (including Commercial Crew and Cargo) is a good thing to fund, while NASA in-house booster developments (see numbers in the Generic reason below) are very likely to be massive wastes of scarce funds. Those of you who’ve already contacted your Representative might want to contact your Senators now too. Those of you who haven’t yet made a contact, why not? More when we know more.
For much more background detail, see Space Access Update #117 and Space Access Update #118.
Let’s keep the pressure up.
[Update a while later]
OK, Henry notes in comments that there’s an even more recent link, which also includes this:
We generally avoid taking partisan positions, as tending to be a distraction from our overall goal of cheap access. We will occasionally mention partisan matters that are actually relevant to our goals. Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R CA) is a long-time member of the House Science Committee who on space matters over the years has pushed in what we think is the right direction considerably more often than not. Notably so in this year’s NASA funding fight, where he’s been on the correct side of some very muddled party lines, standing up for sound NASA policy over local partisan pork.
We understand he’s interested in becoming Chair of the Science Committee in the event the Republicans become the majority party in the House. We think that he would make a good Chairman for our purposes. He has a new website that is among other things concerned with helping him campaign for that post within his party. We’re passing word along so that if you’re so inclined, you can take a look and decide for yourself whether to help.
Having Dana as head of the Science Committee would be great news for those of us seeking a more enlightened space policy.
Thanks for the link, Rand!
Alas, that’s the link to last week’s quick report. This week’s news is much the same – HR.5781 not on the House Calendar for another week – but we have a bit more info, plus a look at the different things that might happen in the next couple weeks, at http://www.space-access.org/updates/sau119.html
Someday Dana Rohrabacher will be interviewed about NASA… someday.
A quick and dirty google produces few stories. One from Wired in 2005, http://www.wired.com/science/space/news/2005/06/67697
And another from NPR in 2007, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7867322
But Spacetransportnews.com yielded a good search result, guess I’ll be reading up later this afternoon.