Imagine that in, say, 1982006, Klansmen had hung out at a polling place in Georgia, holding a night stick, and intimidating black voters. And it was caught on video tape. And the Bush administration Justice Department had prosecuted the perps, gotten default convictions, and then basically walked away from the case, giving one of them a slap on the wrist. And it was determined that this was not a legal decision, but a political one, and that some of those responsible had lied under oath to Congress about it, and there was reason to know that the Attorney General was at least aware of it, and perhaps even drove the decision.
Imagine that. Imagine the bays of outrage from the press, demanding Congressional hearings, and to know what the president knew and when he knew it.
Well, that’s sort of what’s happening now. Except, of course, without the Congressional hearings or discussion from the media. Other than Fox News, and PJM, which of course, as the White House said, aren’t legitimate news sources.
I’m assuming you mean 2006.
A crime in 1986 would likely be prosecuted in 1988 under Bush I… given the size of court dockets.
Mike Lorrey:
You probably mean 1989.
January 20, 1989, the end of an era.
January 20, 2013, the end of an error.
I doubt if we’ll ever hear much about it.
That will probably be the collective decision of JournoList, yes…