9 thoughts on “Some ObamaCare Questions”

  1. You’d think those questions would shine a light on the idiotic reasoning surrounding the commerce clause. It needs to be struck.

  2. If, under the Commerce Clause, Congress can regulate individual inactivity because such refusal to engage in commerce will have a substantial effect on the national health-care scheme, is there anything Congress cannot regulate? If so, what?

    Good luck on getting a straight answer with that one — might as well ask if the emperor is naked.

  3. If, under the Commerce Clause, Congress can regulate individual inactivity because such refusal to engage in commerce will have a substantial effect on the national health-care scheme, is there anything Congress cannot regulate? If so, what?

    Or stated more simply, “What are the limits of the Commerce Clause?”

    This would put the onus on the nominee to answer a tough question without framing it in terms of a particular issue likely to come before the court. Any nominee should refuse to answer questions about specific issues but asking about the limits of the Commerce Clause is very broad based.

    Ask the question, then watch the nominee squirm.

  4. “You’d think those questions would shine a light on the idiotic reasoning surrounding the commerce clause. It needs to be struck.”

    You’d think having 30 billion Americans being able to see a doctor for the first time in their lives, affordably, while reducing both the size of government and the deficit would show the moral bankruptcy of such an overtly evil statement.

    Right, Jim?

  5. Q: “What are the limits of the Commerce Clause?”

    A: (pause while amulet blinks) “Norman, coordinate!”

  9. Spork, MfK was mocking the Jim to which his comment was addressed. Jim is an unapologetic apologist for all things Obamarrhoidal, and a point-misser par excellence.

Comments are closed.