11 thoughts on “The President Lying About ACORN?”

  1. Obama the liar is no shock. Over 40% supporting him should be. Acorn is defunded in congress and it’s reversed by the court. Rino’s and O’Reilly are apologists for the media lying to us and spend their time reforming those we do find out about. Our liberty is denied at all levels of government. The truth needs to be important enough that liars all go back to hiding in the dark. O’keefe is about the best thing to come out of this year. Hopefully he will be able to defend himself and continue to exposes these roaches and others will join in.

  2. I thought this was going to show obama helped ACORN do fraud or something. Instead there is what??? When acorn was legit he told them he cared about their input, and when acorn was illegit he said he didn’t get their input??? THIS IS THE LIE???????

  3. ?????????, the problem is that Obama is not just characterizing his current relationship with ACORN, but also his entire past relationship. The latter is where the lie lies. When ACORN was legit, he claimed he’d always had been a partner with ACORN and doing a number of activities with ACORN (implying that he worked with the organization on some things). When ACORN “was illegit” a few months later, he claimed his only interaction with ACORN was when he legally represented them 13 years earlier. The two statements cannot both be true.

  4. Karl,
    you left out the obvious, to most of us, conclusion in this story. For ??????? perhaps it needs spelling out..

    Dear,
    ?????????, if Mr. Obama had NOTHING to hide in his relationship with ACORN, he’d be crowing about it, not denying it one time, and assuring it another. And of it was JUST ACORN it would be a small problem for his credibility. But he does it repeatedly, with friends, and groups. Not to mention his speeches. He vilifies Group A and C, when he speaks to Group B, vilifies Groups B and C, when he speaks to Group A, and so on through the alphabet. To quote Kris Kristofferson, Obama is a walking contradiction.

    And the only things he hasn’t blamed Bush for are Christ’s crucifixion and male pattern baldness!!

  5. Obama is a classic example of a politician talking out both sides of their mouth. In this age of YouTube it is increasingly difficult for politicians to get away with this — which is a good thing. You know he totally loathes the fact because when he made his school speech to the kids last year he said something to the effect that kids should be careful of stupid Facebook posts in the age of YouTube. To me, this spoke more of a personal lesson learned that he was internalizing then something he was just pointing out to the kids in the abstract.

  6. Rand, considering this level of expected veracity from our Dear Leader, why would you place your trust in his words on any different matter? Like, the Space Program?

  7. Rand, considering this level of expected veracity from our Dear Leader, why would you place your trust in his words on any different matter? Like, the Space Program?

    I didn’t say I do. But I’d still rather have a stated policy that makes sense, even if I can’t count on it staying in place, than one that is a guaranteed disaster, which is where we were.

  8. A long time ago Uncle Frank probably taught young Barry: “There is no truth but revolutionary truth.”

    Or as George Costanza put it:

    “Remember, Jerry . . . it’s not a lie, if you believe it.”

  9. Well he says “as an elected official, I’ve had interactions with them” I think that line covers everything he said in the other video. Playing it down in one place, playing it up in another. He is very careful not to say a straight up lie.

    This is just like my lawyer girlfriend! 🙂 Except she will tell me when she does it, usually she errs on the side of too much honesty, not being a politician.

  10. “Rand, considering this level of expected veracity from our Dear Leader, why would you place your trust in his words on any different matter? Like, the Space Program?”

    After seeing the behind-the-scenes at every level of this new NASA policy, I am almost certain that Obama thinks he is destroying the U.S. manned space program, and that that is his intent.

    Whether it turns out to be “The Producers” (or “The Fountainhead”) or not remains to be seen. The economic climate is not good for something as marginal as commercial space transportation. All we can count on is Elon’s tenacity, which he has in abundance…

  11. OMG… People, our US democracy doesn’t looks like it seems to work so good at this time. Sometimes i wonder if socialist and communist countries are pointing the the US. We are starting to become like a third world nation these days …

Comments are closed.