Copenhagen

collapsing. This week just keeps getting better and better.

And as the commenters point out, it’s amazing how ignorant of the Constitution our “Constitutional scholar” in the White House is. Perhaps it wouldn’t be as amazing if we were to ever see his transcripts, though.

3 thoughts on “Copenhagen”

  1. Huh, so we can’t get many countries to “commit” to a non-binding agreement? That’s remarkably pathetic. And the UN will hold Obama to his promises (so says the NYT, so it must be)? They should have held out for magic, pink unicorns for every boy and girl. At least then they’d have a chance of getting something out of that “promise”.

  2. and even better!

    Thanks to the Supreme Court corporations now have the same protection for political speech that individuals have…

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012104866.html?hpid%3Dtopnews&sub=AR

    Supreme Court rejects limits on corporate spending on political campaigns

    By Robert Barnes and Dan Eggen
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Friday, January 22, 2010

    [[[A divided Supreme Court on Thursday swept aside decades of legislative restrictions on the role of corporations in political campaigns, ruling that companies can dip into their treasuries to spend as much as they want to support or oppose individual candidates. ]]]

    The Constitution rules!

  3. The warmmongers are now coming into sharp focus. When driving long distances at night, I used to listen to equally passionate and convincing guests on Coast to Coast AM (especially with George Noory). That’s where climate science and its practitioners belongs…

Comments are closed.