In the furor (well, at least as much furor as could be expected, given how in the tank the mainstream media has been for Senator Obama) over his comments about the deficiencies of the Constitution (in regard for its lack of “positive rights”) and the frustrating (at least to him) inability of the courts to deal with it, many have missed another snippet of that radio interview from seven years ago. In it, he also said, “There’s a lot of change going on outside of the court. The judges have to essentially take judicial notice up, I mean you’ve got WW II, the doctrines of Nazism that we are fighting against that started looking uncomfortably similar to what’s going on back here at home.”
“…similar to what’s going on back here at home.”
What did he mean by that?
Well, most people know the characteristics of the Nazi regime (or at least imagine they do), so it’s hard to imagine what he’s talking about here, since he gives no specifics.
Was he referring to the fact that it was led by a charismatic man who gave speeches to mesmerized, adoring throngs in front of Teutonic war memorials?
Or is he talking about the Nazi policy of first registering, then confiscating weapons from private citizens, one of its first acts upon taking power?
Perhaps he was referring to the notion that work exhorted by the leader would set us free? That we need to have national service for all? And that the nation will be inspired by youth singing in patriotic uniforms?
Or was it demanding to see the papers of critics of the leader, and using the state apparatus to discover information that might expose him to ridicule?
No?
Well, was it the nationalistic racism? Or the plans to exterminate a large percentage of the citizenry after taking power?
OK, maybe I’m on the wrong track. Was he talking about the Nazi health care system, that so many here want to emulate? Or the need to spread the wealth around? I mean, isn’t that what socialism is all about?
I just can’t figure it out.
OK, maybe I’m just confused. Maybe this latest slur against Senator Obama of being a “socialist” is wrong. Maybe Senator Obama is something else.
Take away the genocide, and militaristic conquest of neighboring countries. Just what is it about Nazis that Barack Obama doesn’t like?
It would certainly be nice if the Obama campaign would expand and elaborate upon his brief comments about Nazism in America a few years ago to the American people. He has another few days to do so before they have to decide who their next president will be.
Are you sure?
Just what is it about Nazis that Barack Obama doesn’t like?
They lost.
Are you sure?
Not entirely, no.
That’s Ok. Mexican government is pretty incompetent. It’s hard to believe, I know, but yes, they would be better off with Barney Frank than what they’ve got.
The Nazis didn’t need to disarm the people as one of their first acts (and note that your link points to a 1938 law. That’s five years after they took power) – or introduce gun registration or bans.
The Weimar government had already done that for them.
The person you link to on that has their heart in the right place, but their facts thoroughly wrong.
The Weimar government had already done that for them.
Rome was not built in a day.